Can fish hear? Studying fish ears in eighteenth-century natural history

Abstract This article investigates the dispute about auditory perception in fish that took place in the mid-eighteenth century, when the question of whether fish could hear was heavily debated in academic societies in France, England, Germany, and the Low Countries. Arguing that this dispute contains key insights into the understanding of animal hearing in eighteenth-century natural history, this article charts the different ways in which how and why early modern naturalists tried to create knowledge about this difficult subject. I discuss the efforts at the Royal Society of London and by individual scholars such as Jean-Antoine Nollet, Jacob Theodor Klein, and Petrus Camper to study underwater hearing by means of anatomy, animal physiology, and acoustic experiments. Although the role of non-human animals in historical notions of hearing has received little attention, this article argues that animals were central to the question of what it means to hear and to the establishment of an eighteenth-century science of hearing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Notes and Records the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2025.0045
Primary Topic
Historical Philosophy and Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can fish hear? Studying fish ears in eighteenth-century natural history

Leendert van der Miesen
Notes and Records the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science
Historical Philosophy and Science
article

Can fish hear? Studying fish ears in eighteenth-century natural history

Leendert van der Miesen
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article investigates the dispute about auditory perception in fish that took place in the mid-eighteenth century, when the question of whether fish could hear was heavily debated in academic societies in France, England, Germany, and the Low Countries. Arguing that this dispute contains key insights into the understanding of animal hearing in eighteenth-century natural history, this article charts the different ways in which how and why early modern naturalists tried to create knowledge about this difficult subject. I discuss the efforts at the Royal Society of London and by individual scholars such as Jean-Antoine Nollet, Jacob Theodor Klein, and Petrus Camper to study underwater hearing by means of anatomy, animal physiology, and acoustic experiments. Although the role of non-human animals in historical notions of hearing has received little attention, this article argues that animals were central to the question of what it means to hear and to the establishment of an eighteenth-century science of hearing.

Notes and Records the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science
Rijksmuseum (NL)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Historical Philosophy and Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.