Looks can be deceiving: discordances in phylogeny and morphology within loricate choanoflagellates

Choanoflagellates are heterotrophic holozoans that are classified into two groups based on their morphology: loricates, which possess silica-based extracellular structures, and craspedids, which do not. Loricate choanoflagellate taxonomy has historically been based on selected aspects of their lorica morphology and on their division mode, either tectiform or nudiform. Here, we characterize two new loricate strains, BEAP0094 and BEAP0360, that display unexpected morphological features when compared to their closest genetic relatives. The ribosomal gene sequence of BEAP0094 closely matched Pseudostephanoeca paucicostata, but its lorica lacked the characteristic anterior ring found in all Stephanoeca species. Instead, its lorica resembled the Acanthocorbis genus, raising the possibility of the existence of either multiple lorica morphologies in closely related species or multiple species sharing the same ribosomal 18S gene. In contrast, BEAP0360 presented a morphological match to Stephanoeca cauliculata, but its sequence did not, suggesting that different species could share the same lorica architecture. BEAP0360, here described as Cepoeca plumata (n. gen. n. sp.), possesses a key phylogenetic placement, potentially as the earliest-branching nudiform loricate. Our findings are inconsistent with a strict classification based on lorica morphology and support the usage of genetic data as primary criterion for genus-level taxonomic assignment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Biology
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.250261
Primary Topic
Protist diversity and phylogeny
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Looks can be deceiving: discordances in phylogeny and morphology within loricate choanoflagellates

Brian Palenik, D. D. Richter, Florentine U. Rutaganira, Àlex Gàlvez-Morante
Open Biology
Protist diversity and phylogeny
article

Looks can be deceiving: discordances in phylogeny and morphology within loricate choanoflagellates

Brian Palenik, D. D. Richter, Florentine U. Rutaganira, Àlex Gàlvez-Morante
article en

Abstract

Choanoflagellates are heterotrophic holozoans that are classified into two groups based on their morphology: loricates, which possess silica-based extracellular structures, and craspedids, which do not. Loricate choanoflagellate taxonomy has historically been based on selected aspects of their lorica morphology and on their division mode, either tectiform or nudiform. Here, we characterize two new loricate strains, BEAP0094 and BEAP0360, that display unexpected morphological features when compared to their closest genetic relatives. The ribosomal gene sequence of BEAP0094 closely matched Pseudostephanoeca paucicostata, but its lorica lacked the characteristic anterior ring found in all Stephanoeca species. Instead, its lorica resembled the Acanthocorbis genus, raising the possibility of the existence of either multiple lorica morphologies in closely related species or multiple species sharing the same ribosomal 18S gene. In contrast, BEAP0360 presented a morphological match to Stephanoeca cauliculata, but its sequence did not, suggesting that different species could share the same lorica architecture. BEAP0360, here described as Cepoeca plumata (n. gen. n. sp.), possesses a key phylogenetic placement, potentially as the earliest-branching nudiform loricate. Our findings are inconsistent with a strict classification based on lorica morphology and support the usage of genetic data as primary criterion for genus-level taxonomic assignment.

Open BiologyVol. 16(2)
University of San Diego (US), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), University of California San Diego (US), Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (ES), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Protist diversity and phylogeny
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.