Why addressing HIV stigma should be our number one priority in the HIV response

If we are to achieve the UNAIDS 95-95-95 goals, and eventually eradicate HIV, we need to prioritise stigma reduction, and we need to be smart about how we do it. This position paper gives an overview of the ways in which HIV stigma impacts the cascade of care outcomes, provides guidance for effective stigma reductions interventions, and delineates priorities for understanding and addressing stigma in the HIV response. It makes clear that various forms of stigma deleteriously impact prevention and testing, linkage to care, initiation and adherence to antiretroviral treatment, and viral suppression, and it describes stigma reduction methods for public stigma, self-stigma, and structural stigma. It furthermore argues that stigma interventions should be systematically developed, theory- and evidence-based, tailored to context, and co-designed and co-implemented with recipient populations. Lastly, this paper argues for a better measurement of stigma, not by seeking consensus on construct definitions and corresponding measures but rather through the transparent reporting of definitions and their operationalisations.

Publication Details

Journal
HIV Research & Clinical Practice
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/25787489.2026.2638007
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why addressing HIV stigma should be our number one priority in the HIV response

HIV Research & Clinical Practice
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

Why addressing HIV stigma should be our number one priority in the HIV response

article en

Abstract

If we are to achieve the UNAIDS 95-95-95 goals, and eventually eradicate HIV, we need to prioritise stigma reduction, and we need to be smart about how we do it. This position paper gives an overview of the ways in which HIV stigma impacts the cascade of care outcomes, provides guidance for effective stigma reductions interventions, and delineates priorities for understanding and addressing stigma in the HIV response. It makes clear that various forms of stigma deleteriously impact prevention and testing, linkage to care, initiation and adherence to antiretroviral treatment, and viral suppression, and it describes stigma reduction methods for public stigma, self-stigma, and structural stigma. It furthermore argues that stigma interventions should be systematically developed, theory- and evidence-based, tailored to context, and co-designed and co-implemented with recipient populations. Lastly, this paper argues for a better measurement of stigma, not by seeking consensus on construct definitions and corresponding measures but rather through the transparent reporting of definitions and their operationalisations.

HIV Research & Clinical PracticeVol. 27(1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.