Ecological Impact Assessment of Production–Living–Ecological Space Optimization in the Southern Taihang Region: A Multi-Scenario Simulation with the PLUS Model

The intensifying conflict between urban–rural development and the natural environment under rapid industrialization and urbanization underscores the necessity to balance ecological preservation with economic growth for sustainable land use. Grounded in the Production–Living–Ecological Space (PLES) theory, this study classifies land use into production, living and ecological functional types to set three scenarios (natural development, production–living priority, ecological priority), and employs the PLUS model with a land use conversion cost matrix and spatial driving factors as input variables to simulate land use changes and their ecological impacts. Analysis of the period 2010–2020 reveals an initial decline followed by a recovery in ecological quality, highlighting the urgency of improved spatial planning. Projections for 2025–2035 based on the PLES theory reveal divergent trajectories across three scenarios simulated by the PLUS model, whereas the production–living priority scenario accelerates urban–industrial expansion and exacerbates environmental degradation by driving irrational land use conversion. In contrast, the ecological priority scenario significantly enhances ecological and environmental quality while minimizing the loss of agricultural land, achieving a more sustainable balance between development and conservation. Through quantitative calculation of the ecological contribution rate of land use transitions, the internal conversion of agricultural production space contributes the most to regional ecological quality improvement (42.50% in 2025–2030 in the ecological priority scenario), and forest PLES land use category has the highest ecological environment index (0.2836 in 2025) among all PLES types, emphasizing the pivotal role of agricultural production space and the high ecological value of forestland in regional ecosystems. These findings demonstrate that prioritizing ecological strategies is essential for realizing a win–win outcome between ecological protection and economic development, offering actionable insights for sustainable land use planning in ecologically fragile transition zones similar to the Southern Taihang region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16050530
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ecological Impact Assessment of Production–Living–Ecological Space Optimization in the Southern Taihang Region: A Multi-Scenario Simulation with the PLUS Model

S. Y. Li, Shun Wang, Xiaohu Liu, Xinchuang Wang et al.
Agriculture
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Ecological Impact Assessment of Production–Living–Ecological Space Optimization in the Southern Taihang Region: A Multi-Scenario Simulation with the PLUS Model

S. Y. Li, Shun Wang, Xiaohu Liu, Xinchuang Wang, Runbo Chen, Ruopu Ma
article en

Abstract

The intensifying conflict between urban–rural development and the natural environment under rapid industrialization and urbanization underscores the necessity to balance ecological preservation with economic growth for sustainable land use. Grounded in the Production–Living–Ecological Space (PLES) theory, this study classifies land use into production, living and ecological functional types to set three scenarios (natural development, production–living priority, ecological priority), and employs the PLUS model with a land use conversion cost matrix and spatial driving factors as input variables to simulate land use changes and their ecological impacts. Analysis of the period 2010–2020 reveals an initial decline followed by a recovery in ecological quality, highlighting the urgency of improved spatial planning. Projections for 2025–2035 based on the PLES theory reveal divergent trajectories across three scenarios simulated by the PLUS model, whereas the production–living priority scenario accelerates urban–industrial expansion and exacerbates environmental degradation by driving irrational land use conversion. In contrast, the ecological priority scenario significantly enhances ecological and environmental quality while minimizing the loss of agricultural land, achieving a more sustainable balance between development and conservation. Through quantitative calculation of the ecological contribution rate of land use transitions, the internal conversion of agricultural production space contributes the most to regional ecological quality improvement (42.50% in 2025–2030 in the ecological priority scenario), and forest PLES land use category has the highest ecological environment index (0.2836 in 2025) among all PLES types, emphasizing the pivotal role of agricultural production space and the high ecological value of forestland in regional ecosystems. These findings demonstrate that prioritizing ecological strategies is essential for realizing a win–win outcome between ecological protection and economic development, offering actionable insights for sustainable land use planning in ecologically fragile transition zones similar to the Southern Taihang region.

AgricultureVol. 16(5)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Ministry of Natural Resources (CN), Institute of Botany (CN), Henan Polytechnic University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.