When References Mislead: Verification, AI Attribution, and Academic Bullying in Scholarly Evaluation

This editorial introduces Volume 2, Issue 1 (2026) of AI & Antiquity, which examines the epistemic and institutional implications of artificial intelligence for Ancient Studies. Rather than adopting celebratory or alarmist positions, the issue frames AI as a negotiated space between pedagogy and research, automation and responsibility, and innovation and scholarly trust. The contributions explore AI as a cognitive mediator in the classroom, a methodological instrument in historical inquiry, and a force reshaping cultural memory, historiography, and public heritage discourse. Emphasis is placed on verification, reflexivity, and critical literacy as core scholarly competencies in AI-assisted environments. The volume also addresses emerging structural challenges, including bibliographic hallucinations, shifting editorial accountability, and the weaponisation of generative systems for reputational harm as a form of technologically mediated academic bullying. By situating these phenomena within broader frameworks of platform governance and institutional ethics, the issue advocates for methodological vigilance, transparent pedagogical practices, and shared regulatory adaptation. Structured as a progression from mediation to method and from memory to inclusion, the volume invites sustained critical engagement with AI as a transformative condition of contemporary knowledge production in Ancient Studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI & Antiquity
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64946/aiantiquity.v2i1.editorial
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When References Mislead: Verification, AI Attribution, and Academic Bullying in Scholarly Evaluation

Carlos Heredia Chimeno
AI & Antiquity
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
article

When References Mislead: Verification, AI Attribution, and Academic Bullying in Scholarly Evaluation

Carlos Heredia Chimeno
article en

Abstract

This editorial introduces Volume 2, Issue 1 (2026) of AI & Antiquity, which examines the epistemic and institutional implications of artificial intelligence for Ancient Studies. Rather than adopting celebratory or alarmist positions, the issue frames AI as a negotiated space between pedagogy and research, automation and responsibility, and innovation and scholarly trust. The contributions explore AI as a cognitive mediator in the classroom, a methodological instrument in historical inquiry, and a force reshaping cultural memory, historiography, and public heritage discourse. Emphasis is placed on verification, reflexivity, and critical literacy as core scholarly competencies in AI-assisted environments. The volume also addresses emerging structural challenges, including bibliographic hallucinations, shifting editorial accountability, and the weaponisation of generative systems for reputational harm as a form of technologically mediated academic bullying. By situating these phenomena within broader frameworks of platform governance and institutional ethics, the issue advocates for methodological vigilance, transparent pedagogical practices, and shared regulatory adaptation. Structured as a progression from mediation to method and from memory to inclusion, the volume invites sustained critical engagement with AI as a transformative condition of contemporary knowledge production in Ancient Studies.

AI & Antiquity
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.