Applications, Challenges, and Future Trends in Using Light‐Based Technologies for Low‐Moisture Foods Decontamination—A Review

Low-moisture foods (LMFs) are prone to microbial contamination. Thermal treatments, although effective, could compromise LMFs quality. Hence, interest in alternative decontamination strategies such as light-based treatments has increased. This manuscript aims to provide insights into using light-based decontamination technologies in LMFs processing by reviewing the 1) microbial contamination issues affecting LMFs, 2) application, mechanisms of action, and process factors affecting light-based decontamination efficacy, and 3) potential challenges and future directions on establishing light-based technologies as a standard LMFs decontamination step. Pathogenic microorganism contamination of LMFs has been well documented in the existing literature. The use of LEDs, UV, and pulsed light (PL) in diverse LMFs categories produced reductions ranging from 0.7 to 4.0. These reductions were facilitated by induced inactivation mechanisms including ROS generation, cell membrane damage, DNA damage, and localized heating. The decontamination efficacy of LEDs, UV, and PL treatments was also affected by factors such as target microorganism, processing conditions, and inherent food matrix characteristics of treated LMFs. The review findings also found critical gaps that need to be addressed such as 1) lack of standardized experiment/validation methodologies, 2) inadequate exposure of LMFs due to shadowing/obstruction, 3) sub-optimal process and light delivery engineering, 4) lack of process validations on scaled-up/commercial equipment, and 5) insufficient techno-economic assessments on cost-effectiveness and throughput capability. The review findings indicate that light-based technologies can be a viable alternative decontamination step for LMFs although they have critical limitations to be addressed before being fully usable in LMFs processing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.70433
Primary Topic
Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applications, Challenges, and Future Trends in Using Light‐Based Technologies for Low‐Moisture Foods Decontamination—A Review

Kaliramesh Siliveru, Shivaprasad Doddabematti Prakash, Jared Lou Rivera, Rohan Rajendraji Bhujle et al.
Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety
Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
article

Applications, Challenges, and Future Trends in Using Light‐Based Technologies for Low‐Moisture Foods Decontamination—A Review

Kaliramesh Siliveru, Shivaprasad Doddabematti Prakash, Jared Lou Rivera, Rohan Rajendraji Bhujle, Nidhi Nayak, Swetha G. Gouda, N A Nanje Gowda
article en

Abstract

Low-moisture foods (LMFs) are prone to microbial contamination. Thermal treatments, although effective, could compromise LMFs quality. Hence, interest in alternative decontamination strategies such as light-based treatments has increased. This manuscript aims to provide insights into using light-based decontamination technologies in LMFs processing by reviewing the 1) microbial contamination issues affecting LMFs, 2) application, mechanisms of action, and process factors affecting light-based decontamination efficacy, and 3) potential challenges and future directions on establishing light-based technologies as a standard LMFs decontamination step. Pathogenic microorganism contamination of LMFs has been well documented in the existing literature. The use of LEDs, UV, and pulsed light (PL) in diverse LMFs categories produced reductions ranging from 0.7 to 4.0. These reductions were facilitated by induced inactivation mechanisms including ROS generation, cell membrane damage, DNA damage, and localized heating. The decontamination efficacy of LEDs, UV, and PL treatments was also affected by factors such as target microorganism, processing conditions, and inherent food matrix characteristics of treated LMFs. The review findings also found critical gaps that need to be addressed such as 1) lack of standardized experiment/validation methodologies, 2) inadequate exposure of LMFs due to shadowing/obstruction, 3) sub-optimal process and light delivery engineering, 4) lack of process validations on scaled-up/commercial equipment, and 5) insufficient techno-economic assessments on cost-effectiveness and throughput capability. The review findings indicate that light-based technologies can be a viable alternative decontamination step for LMFs although they have critical limitations to be addressed before being fully usable in LMFs processing.

Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food SafetyVol. 25(2)
University of Arkansas at Little Rock (US), Jain University (IN), Karnatak University (IN), Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IN), University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (IN), Kansas State University (US), University of Arkansas System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.