Assessing methodological variability in wastewater surveillance: A wavelet decomposition approach

Wastewater surveillance has emerged as a critical public health tool, enabling early detection of infectious disease outbreaks and providing timely, population-level insights into community health trends. However, variability in sample collection and processing, for example, between wastewater influent and settled solids, can introduce methodological noise that differentially impacts true epidemiological signals and limits cross-site comparability. To address this challenge, we aimed to discern underlying disease trends from methodological variability in SARS-CoV-2 wastewater data using the discrete wavelet transform (DWT), with a focus on comparing influent and solids samples from the same geographic locations. We applied DWT to longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations in wastewater from five cities in California: Los Banos, Turlock, Woodland, Winters, and Esparto-each with paired influent and solids samples. DWT decomposes each signal into two components: (1) approximation coefficients that capture smoothed long-term trends, and (2) detail coefficients that isolate high-frequency fluctuations and transient variations in the signal. We reconstructed signals by progressively removing the high-frequency components (detail coefficients) and assessed similarity between sample types using hierarchical clustering. Clustering of raw signals did not yield city-specific groupings, indicating that methodological noise obscured the underlying epidemiological signal. Intermediate reconstructions that retained some high-frequency components continued to show mixed groupings. In contrast, reconstructions based solely on low-frequency approximation coefficients revealed clear, city-specific clustering, with influent and solids samples from the same city aligning closely. These findings support our hypothesis that high-frequency components are primarily driven by sample processing and laboratory noise, while low-frequency components reflect shared epidemiological trends. Our findings underscore the importance of denoising in wastewater data preprocessing and offer a scalable approach for enhancing signal comparability across regions and sample types.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epidemics
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2026.100897
Primary Topic
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing methodological variability in wastewater surveillance: A wavelet decomposition approach

Colleen C. Naughton, Maria L. Daza–Torres, C. Winston Bess, Rachel Olson et al.
Epidemics
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
article

Assessing methodological variability in wastewater surveillance: A wavelet decomposition approach

Colleen C. Naughton, Maria L. Daza–Torres, C. Winston Bess, Rachel Olson, J. Cricelio Montesinos-López, Miriam Nuño, Heather N. Bischel
article en

Abstract

Wastewater surveillance has emerged as a critical public health tool, enabling early detection of infectious disease outbreaks and providing timely, population-level insights into community health trends. However, variability in sample collection and processing, for example, between wastewater influent and settled solids, can introduce methodological noise that differentially impacts true epidemiological signals and limits cross-site comparability. To address this challenge, we aimed to discern underlying disease trends from methodological variability in SARS-CoV-2 wastewater data using the discrete wavelet transform (DWT), with a focus on comparing influent and solids samples from the same geographic locations. We applied DWT to longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations in wastewater from five cities in California: Los Banos, Turlock, Woodland, Winters, and Esparto-each with paired influent and solids samples. DWT decomposes each signal into two components: (1) approximation coefficients that capture smoothed long-term trends, and (2) detail coefficients that isolate high-frequency fluctuations and transient variations in the signal. We reconstructed signals by progressively removing the high-frequency components (detail coefficients) and assessed similarity between sample types using hierarchical clustering. Clustering of raw signals did not yield city-specific groupings, indicating that methodological noise obscured the underlying epidemiological signal. Intermediate reconstructions that retained some high-frequency components continued to show mixed groupings. In contrast, reconstructions based solely on low-frequency approximation coefficients revealed clear, city-specific clustering, with influent and solids samples from the same city aligning closely. These findings support our hypothesis that high-frequency components are primarily driven by sample processing and laboratory noise, while low-frequency components reflect shared epidemiological trends. Our findings underscore the importance of denoising in wastewater data preprocessing and offer a scalable approach for enhancing signal comparability across regions and sample types.

EpidemicsVol. 54
University of California, Merced (US), Department of Public Health (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.