Rapid Response Systems as Secondary Responders to In-Hospital Clinical Deterioration: A Four-Year Observational Study

Background: In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is a major cause of preventable inpatient mortality, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where rapid response systems (RRS) are still developing. Evidence regarding RRS performance in Indonesia is limited. This study evaluated the performance and operational challenges of an institutional RRS over four years at a large tertiary referral hospital in Jakarta.Objective: This study aimed to determine the proportion of immediate survival following RRS activation and to investigate secondary outcomes, including the association between activation indications and mortality, and system-level barriers.Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study included all inpatient RRS activations at Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital (RSCM), Jakarta, Indonesia, from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2024. Data from the hospital’s RRS registry were analyzed for activation triggers, interventions, immediate outcomes, and operational issues.Results: Among 246,367 inpatient admissions, there were 5,900 eligible inpatient RRS activations, yielding an activation rate of 23.9 per 1,000 admissions. Immediate survival occurred in 4,763 (80.7%) events, while 1,137 (19.3%) patients did not survive. Cardiac arrest (8.0%) and respiratory arrest (6.5%) were the strongest predictors of non-survival odds ratio (OR) 48.17 and 27.13 vs. red early warning score (EWS) reference, both p<0.001). Most activations occurred out of hours (63.0%), and mortality was significantly higher (71.3% vs. 61.1%; p < 0.001). The most frequent single-parameter triggers were oxygen saturation ≤90% (38.5%) and sudden deterioration of consciousness (15.8%). Mismatched activations, where the patient’s condition upon team arrival differed from the activation indicationwere strongly associated with higher mortality (OR 17.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 14.3–20.2, p<0.001).Conclusion: The institutional RRS demonstrated a moderate activation rate and favorable immediate survival compared with similar LMIC settings. However, outcomes were influenced by delayed recognition, out-of-hours activation, and limited critical-care capacity. Strengthening early-escalation culture, monitoring afferent-limb failure (ALF), expanding nighttime coverage, and increasing intensive care unit (ICU) capacity are essential to enhance RRS effectiveness and reduce preventable in-hospital mortality in resource-limited settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia)
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14710/jai.v0i0.80762
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rapid Response Systems as Secondary Responders to In-Hospital Clinical Deterioration: A Four-Year Observational Study

Adhrie Sugiarto, Aivi Mujono, Luther Holan Parasian, Andi Ade Wijaya Ramlan et al.
JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia)
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Rapid Response Systems as Secondary Responders to In-Hospital Clinical Deterioration: A Four-Year Observational Study

Adhrie Sugiarto, Aivi Mujono, Luther Holan Parasian, Andi Ade Wijaya Ramlan, Sidharta Kusuma Manggala, Avisa Cetta Cresma, Dita Aditianingsih, Riyadh Firdaus, Yoan Devina, Arief Cahyadi, Aino Nindya Auerkari, Noor Hafidz
article en

Abstract

Background: In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is a major cause of preventable inpatient mortality, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where rapid response systems (RRS) are still developing. Evidence regarding RRS performance in Indonesia is limited. This study evaluated the performance and operational challenges of an institutional RRS over four years at a large tertiary referral hospital in Jakarta.Objective: This study aimed to determine the proportion of immediate survival following RRS activation and to investigate secondary outcomes, including the association between activation indications and mortality, and system-level barriers.Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study included all inpatient RRS activations at Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital (RSCM), Jakarta, Indonesia, from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2024. Data from the hospital’s RRS registry were analyzed for activation triggers, interventions, immediate outcomes, and operational issues.Results: Among 246,367 inpatient admissions, there were 5,900 eligible inpatient RRS activations, yielding an activation rate of 23.9 per 1,000 admissions. Immediate survival occurred in 4,763 (80.7%) events, while 1,137 (19.3%) patients did not survive. Cardiac arrest (8.0%) and respiratory arrest (6.5%) were the strongest predictors of non-survival odds ratio (OR) 48.17 and 27.13 vs. red early warning score (EWS) reference, both p<0.001). Most activations occurred out of hours (63.0%), and mortality was significantly higher (71.3% vs. 61.1%; p < 0.001). The most frequent single-parameter triggers were oxygen saturation ≤90% (38.5%) and sudden deterioration of consciousness (15.8%). Mismatched activations, where the patient’s condition upon team arrival differed from the activation indicationwere strongly associated with higher mortality (OR 17.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 14.3–20.2, p<0.001).Conclusion: The institutional RRS demonstrated a moderate activation rate and favorable immediate survival compared with similar LMIC settings. However, outcomes were influenced by delayed recognition, out-of-hours activation, and limited critical-care capacity. Strengthening early-escalation culture, monitoring afferent-limb failure (ALF), expanding nighttime coverage, and increasing intensive care unit (ICU) capacity are essential to enhance RRS effectiveness and reduce preventable in-hospital mortality in resource-limited settings.

JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia)Vol. 18(1)
University of Indonesia (ID), Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Nasional Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.