“Who the hell is upstream pushing them all in?” Reclaiming public health’s defining metaphor to counter the commercial determinants of health

Public health policy and practice are often described by means of a metaphor that depicts interventions as "upstream" efforts to prevent people from falling into a river, from which they must be rescued "downstream" by overwhelmed healthcare services. The upstream-downstream metaphor has been described as public health's defining metaphor. We apply a commercial determinants of health lens to re-engage with the initial intentions of McKinlay's seminal 1975 essay from which this metaphor emerged, and to critique its current uses. We examine how the upstream-downstream metaphor has come to be used in ways that depart radically from its original intent, which was to characterise the practices of powerful commercial actors who profit from the production of harm and disease. The subtle but important shift in language from people being pushed, to falling into the river, among other depoliticising processes, contributes to an individualising and victim-blaming approach to health harms, deflecting from the role of commercial power and practices. There is a pressing need to reclaim public health's defining metaphor as part of the wider agenda to address commercial determinants as the major public health challenges of our time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0006045
Primary Topic
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Who the hell is upstream pushing them all in?” Reclaiming public health’s defining metaphor to counter the commercial determinants of health

Jeff Collin, Benjamin Hawkins, Mark Petticrew, May C. I. van Schalkwyk
PLOS Global Public Health
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
article

“Who the hell is upstream pushing them all in?” Reclaiming public health’s defining metaphor to counter the commercial determinants of health

Jeff Collin, Benjamin Hawkins, Mark Petticrew, May C. I. van Schalkwyk
article en

Abstract

Public health policy and practice are often described by means of a metaphor that depicts interventions as "upstream" efforts to prevent people from falling into a river, from which they must be rescued "downstream" by overwhelmed healthcare services. The upstream-downstream metaphor has been described as public health's defining metaphor. We apply a commercial determinants of health lens to re-engage with the initial intentions of McKinlay's seminal 1975 essay from which this metaphor emerged, and to critique its current uses. We examine how the upstream-downstream metaphor has come to be used in ways that depart radically from its original intent, which was to characterise the practices of powerful commercial actors who profit from the production of harm and disease. The subtle but important shift in language from people being pushed, to falling into the river, among other depoliticising processes, contributes to an individualising and victim-blaming approach to health harms, deflecting from the role of commercial power and practices. There is a pressing need to reclaim public health's defining metaphor as part of the wider agenda to address commercial determinants as the major public health challenges of our time.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 6(2)
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Addenbrooke's Hospital (GB), MRC Epidemiology Unit (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Health and Care Research Wales, UK Research and Innovation, Open Philanthropy Project, Good Ventures Foundation, Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health and Care Research, British Heart Foundation, Department of Health and Social Care, Public Health Agency, Medical Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.