Promoting genetic and genomic practices among allied healthcare professionals and nurses: a systematic review

Genetic practices are increasingly recognised as essential components of modern healthcare. Allied health professionals and nurses are ideally placed to initiate discussions about genetic investigations with patients and families. However, there are known barriers such as a lack of confidence and knowledge. A key step to addressing these barriers is identifying implementation strategies that support the integration of genetics across healthcare disciplines. We conducted a systematic review to identify empirical and conceptual implementation strategies to support genetic practices among allied health professionals and nurses. We searched CINAHL, Embase, Emcare, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles published from 2020. Twenty-eight full-text articles were included in the review. Identified implementation strategies were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify key areas for behaviour change. Empirical strategies, including workshops, online learning, case-based education, and leadership development, demonstrated positive effects on supporting genetic integration into clinical practice. Conceptual strategies identified included: (1) education/learning, (2) professional development, (3) policy, (4) evaluation tools, and (5) educational resources. The TDF domains of Knowledge, Social Influences, and Social/Professional Role and Identity were commonly found, while the TDF domains of Intentions, Reinforcement, Optimism, Emotion and Goals were underrepresented. Findings demonstrate that empirical and conceptual implementation strategies lack evaluation and tend to focus solely on commonly targeted domains. Future research is needed to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of implementation strategies, explore the underrepresented domains, and support efforts to increase genetic literacy and practices among allied health professionals and nurses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Human Genetics
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-026-02038-5
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Promoting genetic and genomic practices among allied healthcare professionals and nurses: a systematic review

Sanne Peters, Mariana Lauretta, Stephanie Best, tharushini Anandam et al.
European Journal of Human Genetics
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Promoting genetic and genomic practices among allied healthcare professionals and nurses: a systematic review

Sanne Peters, Mariana Lauretta, Stephanie Best, tharushini Anandam, Angela Morgan
article en

Abstract

Genetic practices are increasingly recognised as essential components of modern healthcare. Allied health professionals and nurses are ideally placed to initiate discussions about genetic investigations with patients and families. However, there are known barriers such as a lack of confidence and knowledge. A key step to addressing these barriers is identifying implementation strategies that support the integration of genetics across healthcare disciplines. We conducted a systematic review to identify empirical and conceptual implementation strategies to support genetic practices among allied health professionals and nurses. We searched CINAHL, Embase, Emcare, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles published from 2020. Twenty-eight full-text articles were included in the review. Identified implementation strategies were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify key areas for behaviour change. Empirical strategies, including workshops, online learning, case-based education, and leadership development, demonstrated positive effects on supporting genetic integration into clinical practice. Conceptual strategies identified included: (1) education/learning, (2) professional development, (3) policy, (4) evaluation tools, and (5) educational resources. The TDF domains of Knowledge, Social Influences, and Social/Professional Role and Identity were commonly found, while the TDF domains of Intentions, Reinforcement, Optimism, Emotion and Goals were underrepresented. Findings demonstrate that empirical and conceptual implementation strategies lack evaluation and tend to focus solely on commonly targeted domains. Future research is needed to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of implementation strategies, explore the underrepresented domains, and support efforts to increase genetic literacy and practices among allied health professionals and nurses.

European Journal of Human Genetics
The University of Melbourne (AU), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU), Melbourne Health (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.