Scan-versus-BIM without Registration for As-Built Verification: Verifying MEP Sleeves ahead of Concrete Pours

The prompt identification of deviations during construction is crucial to minimize the propagation of issues and the impact of rectifications. Scan-versus-building information modeling (scan-versus-BIM) has been the subject of many recent studies focusing on several aspects, including deviation detection and progress monitoring. However, most existing scan-versus-BIM solutions rely on registration between the three-dimensional (3D) point cloud and the as-designed 3D model, making the process time-consuming, complex, and prone to error. This limitation can hinder the practical adoption of scan-versus-BIM in construction projects. Therefore, in this study, a new and simplified scan-versus-BIM without a registration approach is proposed. The framework compares features extracted from BIM with those extracted from a point cloud to identify deviations and monitor progress. This was validated in two case studies involving the automatic verification of the locations of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) sleeves in an RC slab before pouring. Results of the case studies indicate that the proposed approach can be reliably used in checking MEP sleeves, as it correctly detected as-built sleeves and deviations when the minimum deviation threshold was set to approximately 10 mm. However, to generalize the results to more complex scenarios or other applications, further case studies and testing are required. This work contributes to the body of knowledge by offering a new perspective on comparing 3D point clouds with as-designed BIM models and presents construction practitioners with a tangible use case that is readily implementable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jaeied.aeeng-2114
Primary Topic
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scan-versus-BIM without Registration for As-Built Verification: Verifying MEP Sleeves ahead of Concrete Pours

Abdullah Alsuhaibani, Fernanda Leite
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
article

Scan-versus-BIM without Registration for As-Built Verification: Verifying MEP Sleeves ahead of Concrete Pours

Abdullah Alsuhaibani, Fernanda Leite
article en

Abstract

The prompt identification of deviations during construction is crucial to minimize the propagation of issues and the impact of rectifications. Scan-versus-building information modeling (scan-versus-BIM) has been the subject of many recent studies focusing on several aspects, including deviation detection and progress monitoring. However, most existing scan-versus-BIM solutions rely on registration between the three-dimensional (3D) point cloud and the as-designed 3D model, making the process time-consuming, complex, and prone to error. This limitation can hinder the practical adoption of scan-versus-BIM in construction projects. Therefore, in this study, a new and simplified scan-versus-BIM without a registration approach is proposed. The framework compares features extracted from BIM with those extracted from a point cloud to identify deviations and monitor progress. This was validated in two case studies involving the automatic verification of the locations of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) sleeves in an RC slab before pouring. Results of the case studies indicate that the proposed approach can be reliably used in checking MEP sleeves, as it correctly detected as-built sleeves and deviations when the minimum deviation threshold was set to approximately 10 mm. However, to generalize the results to more complex scenarios or other applications, further case studies and testing are required. This work contributes to the body of knowledge by offering a new perspective on comparing 3D point clouds with as-designed BIM models and presents construction practitioners with a tangible use case that is readily implementable.

Journal of Architectural EngineeringVol. 32(2)
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.