What Do We Know About Wicked Problems After Nearly 52 Years? Tracing the DNA of Wicked Problems through A Bibliometric Study
This bibliometric study maps 52 years of scholarship on “wicked problems,” tracing the field’s evolution from Rittel and Webber’s foundational framing to contemporary debates on super-wicked problems, clumsy solutions, and adaptive governance. We identify four dominant thematic clusters: collaborative governance, sustainability, policy implementation, and crisis management. Co-citation and co-word analyses reveal two emerging fault lines—one emphasizing networked, deliberative governance and another critiquing collaborative feasibility—and point to novel research frontiers, including joined-up government, pragmatic experimentation, and temporal governance for time-urgent challenges. We propose a typology of wicked problems and outline four governance paradigms to guide practitioners.
Authors
- حسن دانایی فرد
- Guy Peters
- M. Khosravi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9913-6201)
- Brian Head
Institutions
- Tarbiat Modares University (IR)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Administration & Society
- Published
- 2026-02-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997251415534
- Primary Topic
- Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00