Muddling through: A typology of interdisciplinary research practices in environmental sciences

Interdisciplinary research (IDR) is vital for tackling complex global challenges such as climate change and biodiversity loss. Despite its prominence as a research approach, both expertise and experience in IDR are often lacking in projects or programs aiming to address these challenges. This results in a gap between an ideal type of doing IDR and the actual implementation of IDR in practice. This paper addresses this disconnect, drawing on insights from an IDR program, the Blue-Green Biodiversity (BGB) Initiative, in Switzerland. We propose a typology of IDR practices based on our case study: (1) Ideal IDR, where experience in ID practice and expertise in ID scholarship are both leveraged and ID scholars are fully integrated throughout the whole duration of an IDR project; (2) Pragmatic IDR, where experience in ID practice is leveraged by scholars who have conducted IDR in the past, but have only minimal or no formal training and thus only minimal or no expertise in ID scholarship; (3) On-the-go IDR, where emerging ID challenges are tackled, often mid-project, by consulting ID experts or relevant ID scholarship, thus counteracting missing experience in ID practice; and (4) Muddle through IDR, where upcoming ID challenges are addressed ad hoc with no experience in ID practice and only little or no formal training or expertise in ID scholarship. By contrasting empirical practices drawn from our case study with ideal types from IDR scholarship, we provide actionable guidance for more effective IDR, fostering better alignment between the theory and practice of IDR. • Addresses the gap between an ideal type of interdisciplinary research (IDR) and its actual implementation in practice. • Develops a typology of IDR practices based on an empirical case study. • Distinguishes “ideal”, “pragmatic”, “on-the-go” and “muddle through” IDR practices. • Identifies conditions, limitations and potentials related to the four types. • Provides actionable guidance for more effective IDR practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Policy
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104342
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Muddling through: A typology of interdisciplinary research practices in environmental sciences

Sabine Hoffmann, Anita C. Risch, Jana Thierfelder, Blake Matthews
1 citations
Environmental Science & Policy
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
34.32
article

Muddling through: A typology of interdisciplinary research practices in environmental sciences

Sabine Hoffmann, Anita C. Risch, Jana Thierfelder, Blake Matthews
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Interdisciplinary research (IDR) is vital for tackling complex global challenges such as climate change and biodiversity loss. Despite its prominence as a research approach, both expertise and experience in IDR are often lacking in projects or programs aiming to address these challenges. This results in a gap between an ideal type of doing IDR and the actual implementation of IDR in practice. This paper addresses this disconnect, drawing on insights from an IDR program, the Blue-Green Biodiversity (BGB) Initiative, in Switzerland. We propose a typology of IDR practices based on our case study: (1) Ideal IDR, where experience in ID practice and expertise in ID scholarship are both leveraged and ID scholars are fully integrated throughout the whole duration of an IDR project; (2) Pragmatic IDR, where experience in ID practice is leveraged by scholars who have conducted IDR in the past, but have only minimal or no formal training and thus only minimal or no expertise in ID scholarship; (3) On-the-go IDR, where emerging ID challenges are tackled, often mid-project, by consulting ID experts or relevant ID scholarship, thus counteracting missing experience in ID practice; and (4) Muddle through IDR, where upcoming ID challenges are addressed ad hoc with no experience in ID practice and only little or no formal training or expertise in ID scholarship. By contrasting empirical practices drawn from our case study with ideal types from IDR scholarship, we provide actionable guidance for more effective IDR, fostering better alignment between the theory and practice of IDR. • Addresses the gap between an ideal type of interdisciplinary research (IDR) and its actual implementation in practice. • Develops a typology of IDR practices based on an empirical case study. • Distinguishes “ideal”, “pragmatic”, “on-the-go” and “muddle through” IDR practices. • Identifies conditions, limitations and potentials related to the four types. • Provides actionable guidance for more effective IDR practices.

Environmental Science & PolicyVol. 177
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH), ETH Zurich (CH), Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH), Zurich University of the Arts (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
34.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.