Exploring trust in AI-supported military teams using sentiment analysis

Abstract Examining sentiment in team communications can provide information about trust among teammates. Natural language processing (NLP) models provide an efficient means of sentiment analysis. However, military teams and other professional teams use language that differs from what NLP models are trained on, leading to potentially inaccurate sentiment analysis. This study investigates the novel application of two advanced NLP models, DistilBERT and GPT-2, for sentiment analysis of expert military teams conducting AI-supported combat missions in a high fidelity simulation environment. Our fine-tuning process resulted in improved sentiment classification accuracy. The sentiment measures also correlated with measures of team trust and trust in the AI systems, providing valuable insight into the relationship between sentiment and trust in human-AI teaming scenarios. The generalized approach we describe may be useful for adapting sentiment analysis and NLP techniques to military teams, and may help measure trust dynamics and team states in human machine integrated teams.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/is.24046.kuc
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring trust in AI-supported military teams using sentiment analysis

Andrea Krausman, Justin Brooks, Kimberly A. Pollard, David Chhan et al.
1 citations
Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
2.44
article

Exploring trust in AI-supported military teams using sentiment analysis

Andrea Krausman, Justin Brooks, Kimberly A. Pollard, David Chhan, Shan Lakhmani, Murat Kucukosmanoglu, Daniel Forster, Craig Johnson, H. Philip Crowell, Sarah Conklin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Examining sentiment in team communications can provide information about trust among teammates. Natural language processing (NLP) models provide an efficient means of sentiment analysis. However, military teams and other professional teams use language that differs from what NLP models are trained on, leading to potentially inaccurate sentiment analysis. This study investigates the novel application of two advanced NLP models, DistilBERT and GPT-2, for sentiment analysis of expert military teams conducting AI-supported combat missions in a high fidelity simulation environment. Our fine-tuning process resulted in improved sentiment classification accuracy. The sentiment measures also correlated with measures of team trust and trust in the AI systems, providing valuable insight into the relationship between sentiment and trust in human-AI teaming scenarios. The generalized approach we describe may be useful for adapting sentiment analysis and NLP techniques to military teams, and may help measure trust dynamics and team states in human machine integrated teams.

Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial SystemsVol. 26(2)
Machine Intelligence Research Institute (US), Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems (DE), Lamarr Institute for Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, University of Glasgow (GB), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.