Pedagogies for Inclusion in Higher Education (HE): A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies (2015–2025)

The objective of this study was to identify, describe, and synthesize how inclusive pedagogies are conceptualized and implemented in HE and to summarize the main results reported regarding teaching practices that address classroom diversity. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, empirical studies published between 2015 and 2025 in WoS, Scopus, ERIC, SciELO, and DOAJ were retrieved. Methodological quality and risk of bias were appraised using JBI tools. Given the heterogeneity of designs and outcomes, findings were synthesized through narrative and thematic analysis. Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Four thematic domains emerged: inclusive teaching strategies in HE classrooms, students’ perceptions and experiences, institutional policies and practices aimed at inclusion, and resources and support for inclusive teaching. The evidence displays the predominance of classroom-level approaches (active learning, UDL, and DI), while institution-wide, systemic inclusion remains less consistently developed. Faculty beliefs and access to sustained professional development are central enablers, or barriers, to implementation. Despite growing references to inclusive frameworks, a persistent gap exists between institutional discourse and everyday teaching practice. Advanced inclusive pedagogies in HE require a multilevel approach that aligns classroom practices, faculty development, curricular coherence, and institutional policies. Future research should employ more robust and comparative designs to strengthen the evidence base across diverse HE contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18052294
Primary Topic
Disability Education and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pedagogies for Inclusion in Higher Education (HE): A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies (2015–2025)

César Faúndez-Casanova, Lidia Andrea Fuentealba, Valeria Sumonte-Rojas, Gloria Toledo Vega
Sustainability
Disability Education and Employment
article

Pedagogies for Inclusion in Higher Education (HE): A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies (2015–2025)

César Faúndez-Casanova, Lidia Andrea Fuentealba, Valeria Sumonte-Rojas, Gloria Toledo Vega
article en

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify, describe, and synthesize how inclusive pedagogies are conceptualized and implemented in HE and to summarize the main results reported regarding teaching practices that address classroom diversity. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, empirical studies published between 2015 and 2025 in WoS, Scopus, ERIC, SciELO, and DOAJ were retrieved. Methodological quality and risk of bias were appraised using JBI tools. Given the heterogeneity of designs and outcomes, findings were synthesized through narrative and thematic analysis. Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Four thematic domains emerged: inclusive teaching strategies in HE classrooms, students’ perceptions and experiences, institutional policies and practices aimed at inclusion, and resources and support for inclusive teaching. The evidence displays the predominance of classroom-level approaches (active learning, UDL, and DI), while institution-wide, systemic inclusion remains less consistently developed. Faculty beliefs and access to sustained professional development are central enablers, or barriers, to implementation. Despite growing references to inclusive frameworks, a persistent gap exists between institutional discourse and everyday teaching practice. Advanced inclusive pedagogies in HE require a multilevel approach that aligns classroom practices, faculty development, curricular coherence, and institutional policies. Future research should employ more robust and comparative designs to strengthen the evidence base across diverse HE contexts.

SustainabilityVol. 18(5)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), Catholic University of the Maule (CL)
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Disability Education and Employment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.