From Scientific Ideals to Practical Open Science: How reporting on study limitations can diminish Avoidable Research Waste [youtube link to the talk + slides]

*Here is the link to the talk I gave for the LifeSciLab in Uppsala, Sweden. I posted the slides on this website earlier.* [How reporting on study limitations can diminish Avoidable Research Waste](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQaKzdo4sh8) *In the 45-minute talk, I cover the Avoidable Research Waste (ARW) papers of 2009 and 2014. I comment on the links between UNESCO's Open Science Recommendations paper (2021) and Robert Merton's CUDOS principles that describe and prescribe good ways of doing science (1942). I talk about my own work (with Dr. Halil Kilicoglu and others) on self-acknowledgment of limitations and connect that to the question of how we may organize skepticism (the 'OS' in CUDOS) in our research teams). I distinguish four types of limitations and link the types 3 and 4 to multiverse sensitivity analysis, a radical form of testing the robustness of study findings. Finally, I spend 10 minutes on the results of a small study we did at our open science support desk to find out to what extent our faculty's researchers embraced the 14 principles of our internal open science checklist between 2020 and 2023. The last slide discusses slow science, team science and again the organization of skepticism within research settings.* The link between more transparency about our own study limitations and the reduction of research waste should have been made much clearer. A nice challenge for another talk.