From Laboratory Measurements to AI-Driven Insights: Predicting Shaped Charge Performance with Advanced Machine Learning

The accurate estimation of the perforation length is very vital to improve fluid flow as well as the management of charges. Traditional methods, including empirical correlations, analytical models, and API 19B surface tests, suffer from significant limitations in their scope, require frequent recalibration, and fail to capture the complex physics governing shaped charge penetration. This study develops and validates machine learning models for perforation length prediction using a comprehensive dataset of 1648 API 19B standardized tests encompassing diverse gun configurations, explosive properties, and completion parameters. The dataset was partitioned into 1318 tests for model training and hyperparameter optimization, with 330 independent tests reserved for blind validation. Ten regression algorithms were systematically evaluated, with XGBoost demonstrating superior performance, achieving an R2 coefficient of 0.956 on blind validation. Feature importance analysis revealed explosive weight as the dominant predictor, followed by temperature rating. The application of machine learning models offers an accurate, easier, instantaneous during planning and design workflows, and cheaper way of estimation as compared to traditional methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fluids
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids11030064
Primary Topic
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Laboratory Measurements to AI-Driven Insights: Predicting Shaped Charge Performance with Advanced Machine Learning

Badr A. Mohamed, Rouzbeh Ghanbarnezhad Moghanloo, Samuel Nashed, Norhan Sedki et al.
Fluids
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
article

From Laboratory Measurements to AI-Driven Insights: Predicting Shaped Charge Performance with Advanced Machine Learning

Badr A. Mohamed, Rouzbeh Ghanbarnezhad Moghanloo, Samuel Nashed, Norhan Sedki, Muhammad Abdullah, Oluchi Ejehub
article en

Abstract

The accurate estimation of the perforation length is very vital to improve fluid flow as well as the management of charges. Traditional methods, including empirical correlations, analytical models, and API 19B surface tests, suffer from significant limitations in their scope, require frequent recalibration, and fail to capture the complex physics governing shaped charge penetration. This study develops and validates machine learning models for perforation length prediction using a comprehensive dataset of 1648 API 19B standardized tests encompassing diverse gun configurations, explosive properties, and completion parameters. The dataset was partitioned into 1318 tests for model training and hyperparameter optimization, with 330 independent tests reserved for blind validation. Ten regression algorithms were systematically evaluated, with XGBoost demonstrating superior performance, achieving an R2 coefficient of 0.956 on blind validation. Feature importance analysis revealed explosive weight as the dominant predictor, followed by temperature rating. The application of machine learning models offers an accurate, easier, instantaneous during planning and design workflows, and cheaper way of estimation as compared to traditional methods.

FluidsVol. 11(3)
University of Oklahoma (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.