Prophylactic releases of Predatory mites to protect Ruellia simplex from the eriophyoid mite Acalitus simplex

• Acalitus simplex induces erinea that reduce the ornamental value of Ruellia simplex. • Amblyseius swirskii and Am. adhatodae failed to suppress Ac. simplex on already infested plants. • Early establishment of Am. swirskii and Am. adhatodae protected plants from new infestations. • Limited establishment of Am. swirskii and Am. adhatodae when erinea are not present. • Amblyseius swirskii and Am. adhatodae established when erinea were present. The eriophyoid mite Acalitus simplex induces the formation of open galls (erinea) on Ruellia simplex plants in ornamental landscapes, compromising their aesthetic value. Management of A . simplex currently involves implementation of chemical and mechanical methods, while biological control remains largely unexplored. This study aimed to assess the potential of two commercially available predator mite species, Amblyseius andersoni and Am . swirskii , and three naturally occurring predator mite species, Am . adhatodae , Phytoseius woodburyi , and Am . largoensis . Predator efficiency was first evaluated under laboratory conditions by measuring predator oviposition when fed ad libitum on Ac . simplex . Amblyseius swirskii laid significantly more eggs than Am . andersoni , whereas Am . adhatodae and Am . largoensis laid slightly more eggs than P . woodburyi . Amblyseius swirskii and Am. adhatodae were further evaluated under greenhouse conditions using two release approaches: i) curative, after erinea formation, and ii) prophylactic, before erinea formation. Neither predator prevented new erinea formation on already infested plants; however, despite limited development of hyaline erinea, predators were efficient in preventing infestations on previously uninfested plants. In the curative approach, A. swirskii and A. adhatodae successfully established on the plants but did not reduce Ac. simplex population density. In the prophylactic approach, predators substantially reduced Ac. simplex populations, but the low recovery of predator eggs indicated lack of establishment. Our results suggest that if Am . swirskii and Am . adhatodae are established on R. simplex plants prior to Ac. simplex infestation, they can effectively protect plants from the pest.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Control
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2026.105995
Primary Topic
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prophylactic releases of Predatory mites to protect Ruellia simplex from the eriophyoid mite Acalitus simplex

Alexandra M. Revynthi, Marcello De Giosa
Biological Control
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
article

Prophylactic releases of Predatory mites to protect Ruellia simplex from the eriophyoid mite Acalitus simplex

Alexandra M. Revynthi, Marcello De Giosa
article en

Abstract

• Acalitus simplex induces erinea that reduce the ornamental value of Ruellia simplex. • Amblyseius swirskii and Am. adhatodae failed to suppress Ac. simplex on already infested plants. • Early establishment of Am. swirskii and Am. adhatodae protected plants from new infestations. • Limited establishment of Am. swirskii and Am. adhatodae when erinea are not present. • Amblyseius swirskii and Am. adhatodae established when erinea were present. The eriophyoid mite Acalitus simplex induces the formation of open galls (erinea) on Ruellia simplex plants in ornamental landscapes, compromising their aesthetic value. Management of A . simplex currently involves implementation of chemical and mechanical methods, while biological control remains largely unexplored. This study aimed to assess the potential of two commercially available predator mite species, Amblyseius andersoni and Am . swirskii , and three naturally occurring predator mite species, Am . adhatodae , Phytoseius woodburyi , and Am . largoensis . Predator efficiency was first evaluated under laboratory conditions by measuring predator oviposition when fed ad libitum on Ac . simplex . Amblyseius swirskii laid significantly more eggs than Am . andersoni , whereas Am . adhatodae and Am . largoensis laid slightly more eggs than P . woodburyi . Amblyseius swirskii and Am. adhatodae were further evaluated under greenhouse conditions using two release approaches: i) curative, after erinea formation, and ii) prophylactic, before erinea formation. Neither predator prevented new erinea formation on already infested plants; however, despite limited development of hyaline erinea, predators were efficient in preventing infestations on previously uninfested plants. In the curative approach, A. swirskii and A. adhatodae successfully established on the plants but did not reduce Ac. simplex population density. In the prophylactic approach, predators substantially reduced Ac. simplex populations, but the low recovery of predator eggs indicated lack of establishment. Our results suggest that if Am . swirskii and Am . adhatodae are established on R. simplex plants prior to Ac. simplex infestation, they can effectively protect plants from the pest.

Biological ControlVol. 215
Southwest Florida Research (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.