Do Genes Tell the Whole Story? Comparing Genetic Clues and Wet-Lab Tests for Antibiotic Resistance in <i>Salmonella</i>

Foodborne salmonellosis remains a major global health concern, and the rise of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) <i>Salmonella</i> strains poses a challenge to both public health and food safety. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is a promising alternative to phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), yet the performance of WGS-based prediction tools requires thorough evaluation across antimicrobial classes. This study assessed the concordance between phenotypic AST and genotypic predictions generated by two WGS pipelines, abritAMR and Staramr. For the analysis, 33 poultry-associated <i>Salmonella enterica</i> isolates were tested against 15 antibiotics spanning seven classes. Antimicrobial resistance determinants were identified <i>in silico</i> and compared with minimum inhibitory concentration-based AST results. Across antibiotics, both pipelines demonstrated strong and comparable performance, achieving similar positive predictive values (abritAMR 83%; Staramr 80%) and negative predictive values (abritAMR 93%; Staramr 95%). High sensitivity and specificity were observed for most antibiotics, including amikacin, ceftriaxone, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and streptomycin, where both pipelines reached 100% sensitivity with specificity ranging from 88% to 100%. Cohen's κ statistics revealed strong agreement (κ = 0.81-1) for several antibiotics in both abritAMR and Staramr. However, substantial variability was observed for several β-lactams and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, where sensitivity ranged widely (20-100%, depending on the drug and pipeline), reflecting predictive limitations for these classes. Both pipelines met the minimum acceptable performance criteria for 10/15 antibiotics evaluated. Notably, abritAMR demonstrated better overall performance for kanamycin, cefoxitin, and ceftiofur, achieving higher sensitivity and specificity (80-100%) and agreement (κ = 0.81). The disagreements between phenotype and genotype observed may be attributed to factors like gene expression variability, differences in database content, and the complexity of genotype-phenotype relationships. Addressing these gaps may require refinement of pipeline parameters and drug-specific adjustments to improve predictions. Overall, these findings indicate that WGS-based AMR prediction is suitable for several antibiotics, particularly aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, and phenicols.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foodborne Pathogens and Disease
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15353141261425153
Primary Topic
Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Genes Tell the Whole Story? Comparing Genetic Clues and Wet-Lab Tests for Antibiotic Resistance in Salmonella

Claudia A. Narváez-Bravo, Céline Nadon, Daniel Mayboca-Padilla
Foodborne Pathogens and Disease
Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
article

Do Genes Tell the Whole Story? Comparing Genetic Clues and Wet-Lab Tests for Antibiotic Resistance in Salmonella

Claudia A. Narváez-Bravo, Céline Nadon, Daniel Mayboca-Padilla
article en

Abstract

Foodborne salmonellosis remains a major global health concern, and the rise of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) <i>Salmonella</i> strains poses a challenge to both public health and food safety. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is a promising alternative to phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), yet the performance of WGS-based prediction tools requires thorough evaluation across antimicrobial classes. This study assessed the concordance between phenotypic AST and genotypic predictions generated by two WGS pipelines, abritAMR and Staramr. For the analysis, 33 poultry-associated <i>Salmonella enterica</i> isolates were tested against 15 antibiotics spanning seven classes. Antimicrobial resistance determinants were identified <i>in silico</i> and compared with minimum inhibitory concentration-based AST results. Across antibiotics, both pipelines demonstrated strong and comparable performance, achieving similar positive predictive values (abritAMR 83%; Staramr 80%) and negative predictive values (abritAMR 93%; Staramr 95%). High sensitivity and specificity were observed for most antibiotics, including amikacin, ceftriaxone, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and streptomycin, where both pipelines reached 100% sensitivity with specificity ranging from 88% to 100%. Cohen's κ statistics revealed strong agreement (κ = 0.81-1) for several antibiotics in both abritAMR and Staramr. However, substantial variability was observed for several β-lactams and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, where sensitivity ranged widely (20-100%, depending on the drug and pipeline), reflecting predictive limitations for these classes. Both pipelines met the minimum acceptable performance criteria for 10/15 antibiotics evaluated. Notably, abritAMR demonstrated better overall performance for kanamycin, cefoxitin, and ceftiofur, achieving higher sensitivity and specificity (80-100%) and agreement (κ = 0.81). The disagreements between phenotype and genotype observed may be attributed to factors like gene expression variability, differences in database content, and the complexity of genotype-phenotype relationships. Addressing these gaps may require refinement of pipeline parameters and drug-specific adjustments to improve predictions. Overall, these findings indicate that WGS-based AMR prediction is suitable for several antibiotics, particularly aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, and phenicols.

Foodborne Pathogens and Disease
Public Health Agency of Canada (CA), University of Manitoba (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.