Comparison of Various Analytical Methods for Biotin Quantification

This study compared different analytical methods for the quantification of biotin, designated as a fortifying nutrient in the Korean Food Code.Ensuring product quality and safety requires accurate quantification of food additives.On the other hand, the existence of different official biotin quantification methods across countries underscores the importance of identifying the most reliable and suitable approach.The official methods include titration, back titration, and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).These methods differ in their analytical principles, procedural complexity, and sensitivity.The titration method showed 101.240.23%,satisfying the standard specification.It also presented a low standard deviation, reflecting high repeatability.The back titration method yielded a comparable mean value of 101.242.25%,but the larger standard deviation indicated lower precision.HPLC analysis is generally recognized for its superior sensitivity and selectivity.Nevertheless, in this study, even under optimized conditions at 20 C, the relative standard deviation (RSD) values obtained from HPLC exceeded those of the titration method.Furthermore, the lack of a specified column temperature in the official protocol further limits its reliability.Therefore, titration is the most suitable method for biotin quantification in this study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2026.55.2.182
Primary Topic
Biotin and Related Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Various Analytical Methods for Biotin Quantification

Ok-Hwan Lee, Min-Hye Kim, Geun-Hee Cho, Hee-Jae Suh et al.
Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition
Biotin and Related Studies
article

Comparison of Various Analytical Methods for Biotin Quantification

Ok-Hwan Lee, Min-Hye Kim, Geun-Hee Cho, Hee-Jae Suh, Ji-Hyun Im, Sun-Il Choi
article en

Abstract

This study compared different analytical methods for the quantification of biotin, designated as a fortifying nutrient in the Korean Food Code.Ensuring product quality and safety requires accurate quantification of food additives.On the other hand, the existence of different official biotin quantification methods across countries underscores the importance of identifying the most reliable and suitable approach.The official methods include titration, back titration, and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).These methods differ in their analytical principles, procedural complexity, and sensitivity.The titration method showed 101.240.23%,satisfying the standard specification.It also presented a low standard deviation, reflecting high repeatability.The back titration method yielded a comparable mean value of 101.242.25%,but the larger standard deviation indicated lower precision.HPLC analysis is generally recognized for its superior sensitivity and selectivity.Nevertheless, in this study, even under optimized conditions at 20 C, the relative standard deviation (RSD) values obtained from HPLC exceeded those of the titration method.Furthermore, the lack of a specified column temperature in the official protocol further limits its reliability.Therefore, titration is the most suitable method for biotin quantification in this study.

Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and NutritionVol. 55(2)
Kangwon National University (KR), Sun Moon University (KR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Biotin and Related Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.