Intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanics in patients affected by myotonic dystrophy type 1

To compare corneal biomechanical properties in patients affected by Myotonic Dystrophy (DM1) with healthy subjects in order to better understand the underlying reasons for low intraocular pressure (IOP) values detected in DM1 eyes. in this retrospective, comparative study were included 41 eyes of 41 DM1 patients and 41 eyes of healthy subjects, age and sex matched, were included. All participants underwent a complete eye visit including Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), corneal biomechanical properties evaluation performed with Corvis ST (CST) and corneal morphological evaluation through Oculus Pentacam. In this study, GAT-measured IOP was significantly lower in DM1 patients (12.63 ± 2.12 mmHg) compared to controls (16.65 ± 2.24 mmHg) (p < 0.001). DM1 patients, compared to the healthy subjects, showed significant differences in many parameters related to the corneal deformation. In particular, DM1 patients displayed, among others, higher mean values of highest concavity deformation amplitude (1.19 mm vs. 1.04 mm) (p < 0.0008), of deflection amplitude measured at applanation 2 (0.15 mm vs. 0.11 mm) (p < 0.0008), deflection amplitude measured at highest concavity (0.98 mm vs. 0.87 mm) (p < 0.0008) and maximum length of deflection amplitude (1.05 mm vs. 0.88 mm) (p < 0.0008). The findings presented in this study suggest that the corneas of patients affected by DM1 are more susceptible to external stimuli than those of healthy subjects. Thus, GAT may underestimate IOP in DM1 patients due to altered corneal biomechanics. • What is known: Patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) typically present with low intraocular pressure (IOP) values, but the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms remain unclear. • What is new: This study demonstrates that corneas of DM1 patients exhibit significantly higher deformability compared to healthy subjects, as measured by Corvis ST biomechanical parameters. • Clinical significance: The increased corneal deformability suggests that IOP measurements obtained with Goldmann applanation tonometry in DM1 patients may represent an underestimation of true IOP values. • Practical implications: Physicians should be aware that apparently low IOP values in DM1 patients may not represent true hypotony and should exercise caution when screening for glaucoma in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-026-07156-w
Primary Topic
Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanics in patients affected by myotonic dystrophy type 1

Luigi Serra, Francesca Simonelli, Marianna Scutifero, Rosa Boccia et al.
Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
article

Intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanics in patients affected by myotonic dystrophy type 1

Luigi Serra, Francesca Simonelli, Marianna Scutifero, Rosa Boccia, Michele Lanza, Esther Picillo, Teresa Cangiano, Vincenzo Nigro, Italo Fattore
article en

Abstract

To compare corneal biomechanical properties in patients affected by Myotonic Dystrophy (DM1) with healthy subjects in order to better understand the underlying reasons for low intraocular pressure (IOP) values detected in DM1 eyes. in this retrospective, comparative study were included 41 eyes of 41 DM1 patients and 41 eyes of healthy subjects, age and sex matched, were included. All participants underwent a complete eye visit including Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), corneal biomechanical properties evaluation performed with Corvis ST (CST) and corneal morphological evaluation through Oculus Pentacam. In this study, GAT-measured IOP was significantly lower in DM1 patients (12.63 ± 2.12 mmHg) compared to controls (16.65 ± 2.24 mmHg) (p < 0.001). DM1 patients, compared to the healthy subjects, showed significant differences in many parameters related to the corneal deformation. In particular, DM1 patients displayed, among others, higher mean values of highest concavity deformation amplitude (1.19 mm vs. 1.04 mm) (p < 0.0008), of deflection amplitude measured at applanation 2 (0.15 mm vs. 0.11 mm) (p < 0.0008), deflection amplitude measured at highest concavity (0.98 mm vs. 0.87 mm) (p < 0.0008) and maximum length of deflection amplitude (1.05 mm vs. 0.88 mm) (p < 0.0008). The findings presented in this study suggest that the corneas of patients affected by DM1 are more susceptible to external stimuli than those of healthy subjects. Thus, GAT may underestimate IOP in DM1 patients due to altered corneal biomechanics. • What is known: Patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) typically present with low intraocular pressure (IOP) values, but the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms remain unclear. • What is new: This study demonstrates that corneas of DM1 patients exhibit significantly higher deformability compared to healthy subjects, as measured by Corvis ST biomechanical parameters. • Clinical significance: The increased corneal deformability suggests that IOP measurements obtained with Goldmann applanation tonometry in DM1 patients may represent an underestimation of true IOP values. • Practical implications: Physicians should be aware that apparently low IOP values in DM1 patients may not represent true hypotony and should exercise caution when screening for glaucoma in this population.

Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT), University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.