Smart City 2.0 governance policy model: institutional configurations and the politics of urban inclusion in India, Singapore, and Indonesia

Introduction The exponential global urbanisation has demanded advanced governance frameworks capable of attaining complex socio-technological challenges through digitally enabled urban transformation. While first-generation smart city initiatives dealt primarily with technological implementation issues, Smart City 2.0 paradigms, in their more contemporary form, require a prerequisite and deep understanding of governance effectiveness, citizen engagement mechanisms, and cross-contextual implementation strategies. This work fills an essential gap in the state of knowledge on comparative Smart City governance by presenting a study on the nature of Smart City 2.0 implementation in India, Singapore, and Indonesia as Case Studies. Methods Employing a multidimensional comparative framework, this research aims to provide a structured and systematic analysis of governance structures, technology integration strategies, sustainability approaches, and citizen participation mechanisms across three urban development contexts. The methodology combines significant analysis of policy documents, data on implementation, and synthesis of theoretical frameworks to appraise the effectiveness of Smart City 2.0 across different political, economic, and social settings. The analytical framework examines four basic dimensions: models of governance and leadership; strategies for integrating technology; motivations around sustainability and a green environment; and ways citizens are engaged. Results Key findings include a fundamental need for contextual adaptation rather than universal standardisation in Smart City 2.0. India’s driven approach to scalability uses standardised frameworks with local adaptability, achieving a 94% completion rate across 8,067 projects in 100 cities. Singapore’s AI-backed Smart Nation 2.0 has demonstrated total inter-agency coordination, met 110% of the target dates for digital literacy rates, and provided strong infrastructure, ensuring cybersecurity. Collaborative governance model - Indonesia’s dependence on hegemonic digital infrastructure is evident in collaborative initiatives such as the JAKI super-app (6.4 million downloads) in Jakarta, which has been ‘glued’ together (grafted) with over 150 government applications. Discussion This comparative analysis restructures the paradigms of smart cities from a tech-centred emphasis towards a more realistic view of the fundamental contributing factors that are driving the success of Smart City 2.0, demonstrating that it is innovations in governance, capacity building of institutions and citizen-centred service delivery that are playing the central role in the effectiveness of Smart City 2.0. The results provide an evidence-based foundation for policy formulation to navigate the complexities of urban digital transformation and to support place-based governance strategies that integrate technological capacities within local governance structures, participatory mechanisms, and environmental sustainability objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Political Science
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2026.1730870
Primary Topic
Smart Cities and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Smart City 2.0 governance policy model: institutional configurations and the politics of urban inclusion in India, Singapore, and Indonesia

Daud M. Liando, Nina Yuslaini, Nasir Ahmad Ganaie
Frontiers in Political Science
Smart Cities and Technologies
article

Smart City 2.0 governance policy model: institutional configurations and the politics of urban inclusion in India, Singapore, and Indonesia

Daud M. Liando, Nina Yuslaini, Nasir Ahmad Ganaie
article en

Abstract

Introduction The exponential global urbanisation has demanded advanced governance frameworks capable of attaining complex socio-technological challenges through digitally enabled urban transformation. While first-generation smart city initiatives dealt primarily with technological implementation issues, Smart City 2.0 paradigms, in their more contemporary form, require a prerequisite and deep understanding of governance effectiveness, citizen engagement mechanisms, and cross-contextual implementation strategies. This work fills an essential gap in the state of knowledge on comparative Smart City governance by presenting a study on the nature of Smart City 2.0 implementation in India, Singapore, and Indonesia as Case Studies. Methods Employing a multidimensional comparative framework, this research aims to provide a structured and systematic analysis of governance structures, technology integration strategies, sustainability approaches, and citizen participation mechanisms across three urban development contexts. The methodology combines significant analysis of policy documents, data on implementation, and synthesis of theoretical frameworks to appraise the effectiveness of Smart City 2.0 across different political, economic, and social settings. The analytical framework examines four basic dimensions: models of governance and leadership; strategies for integrating technology; motivations around sustainability and a green environment; and ways citizens are engaged. Results Key findings include a fundamental need for contextual adaptation rather than universal standardisation in Smart City 2.0. India’s driven approach to scalability uses standardised frameworks with local adaptability, achieving a 94% completion rate across 8,067 projects in 100 cities. Singapore’s AI-backed Smart Nation 2.0 has demonstrated total inter-agency coordination, met 110% of the target dates for digital literacy rates, and provided strong infrastructure, ensuring cybersecurity. Collaborative governance model - Indonesia’s dependence on hegemonic digital infrastructure is evident in collaborative initiatives such as the JAKI super-app (6.4 million downloads) in Jakarta, which has been ‘glued’ together (grafted) with over 150 government applications. Discussion This comparative analysis restructures the paradigms of smart cities from a tech-centred emphasis towards a more realistic view of the fundamental contributing factors that are driving the success of Smart City 2.0, demonstrating that it is innovations in governance, capacity building of institutions and citizen-centred service delivery that are playing the central role in the effectiveness of Smart City 2.0. The results provide an evidence-based foundation for policy formulation to navigate the complexities of urban digital transformation and to support place-based governance strategies that integrate technological capacities within local governance structures, participatory mechanisms, and environmental sustainability objectives.

Frontiers in Political ScienceVol. 8
University of Kashmir (IN), Islamic University of Riau (ID), Sam Ratulangi University (ID), Central University of Kashmir (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Smart Cities and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.