Authoritarianism in response to threat is possible among the left but more prevalent among the right: a critique of the LWA literature

Introduction There has been a recent surge of interest in left-wing authoritarianism. This new wave has found that LWA is just as prevalent as the more commonly-studied RWA. Following ( Nilsson 2024 ) critique of the LWA literature and ( Osborne et al. 2023 ) suggestion to study threat and authoritarianism across the political spectrum, we conducted secondary data analyses on the interaction between political orientation and different types of threat and the desire for a more authoritarian leader. Method Two cross-sectional samples were collected in Italy in 2022 ( N = 1159) and 2023 ( N = 1668). In both samples, participants were asked their perceived need for a more authoritarian leader and their perceived personal, physical, and economic threat towards two potentially threatening events: The COVID pandemic and the Russian Invasion of Ukraine. Results We found that (1) a left-wing political orientation was associated with a desire for a more authoritarian leader with reference to the Russian Invasion in the 2023 data; a right-wing political orientation was associated with this desire in the other cases; (2) the effect of threat depended on the larger context; (3) there was little difference in the above relationship across political orientation. Discussion Although we found no evidence that LWA is a prevalent as RWA, the relationship between threat and authoritarianism likely depends on the nature of the threats and the perceived capability of an authoritarian leader to resolve these threats. Pre-registered hypotheses, data, and R code are available at https://osf.io/65hrc .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Social Psychology
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frsps.2026.1704627
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Authoritarianism in response to threat is possible among the left but more prevalent among the right: a critique of the LWA literature

Conrad Baldner, Riccardo Rocchi, Parya Mojtahedzadeh, GIAMMARIA TRIMARCO et al.
Frontiers in Social Psychology
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Authoritarianism in response to threat is possible among the left but more prevalent among the right: a critique of the LWA literature

Conrad Baldner, Riccardo Rocchi, Parya Mojtahedzadeh, GIAMMARIA TRIMARCO, Sofia Sorvillo, Ginevra Maltese
article en

Abstract

Introduction There has been a recent surge of interest in left-wing authoritarianism. This new wave has found that LWA is just as prevalent as the more commonly-studied RWA. Following ( Nilsson 2024 ) critique of the LWA literature and ( Osborne et al. 2023 ) suggestion to study threat and authoritarianism across the political spectrum, we conducted secondary data analyses on the interaction between political orientation and different types of threat and the desire for a more authoritarian leader. Method Two cross-sectional samples were collected in Italy in 2022 ( N = 1159) and 2023 ( N = 1668). In both samples, participants were asked their perceived need for a more authoritarian leader and their perceived personal, physical, and economic threat towards two potentially threatening events: The COVID pandemic and the Russian Invasion of Ukraine. Results We found that (1) a left-wing political orientation was associated with a desire for a more authoritarian leader with reference to the Russian Invasion in the 2023 data; a right-wing political orientation was associated with this desire in the other cases; (2) the effect of threat depended on the larger context; (3) there was little difference in the above relationship across political orientation. Discussion Although we found no evidence that LWA is a prevalent as RWA, the relationship between threat and authoritarianism likely depends on the nature of the threats and the perceived capability of an authoritarian leader to resolve these threats. Pre-registered hypotheses, data, and R code are available at https://osf.io/65hrc .

Frontiers in Social PsychologyVol. 4
Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.