Co-creation of education for sustainable development (ESD) in higher education – a case study in physical education teacher education (PETE) in Germany

Purpose Co-creation is proposed as a method to bridge gaps between policy and practice, such as implementing education for sustainable development (ESD) across educational areas. While generally applied in higher education, its systematic use to implement ESD in higher education, and particularly in physical education teacher education (PETE), remains underexplored. This case study aims to examines co-created PETE courses as well as enablers and challenges to co-creative integration of ESD in PETE at a German university. Design/methodology/approach Project documents outlined the types, learning objectives and contents of co-created measures for PETE. Semi-structured interviews with members of the collaboration team (three students, six teacher educators, head of institute) and three teacher educators not involved in co-creation provided insights into enabling and challenging factors of co-creation. Qualitative content analysis identified key factors during co-ideation, co-design and co-implementation. Findings Five measures with a focus on ESD-specific content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge and key sustainability competences were co-designed, with three co-implemented. Enablers included individual motivation linked to ESD’s societal relevance, alignment of ESD and PETE, a diverse collaboration team, equal participation, high ownership of specific measures, supportive leadership and clear yet flexible processes. Challenges included perceived low ESD relevance in PETE, limited ownership of overall project, low student and staff involvement and acceptance, curriculum and time constraints. Practical implications Drawing on the results, this study suggests the following recommendations for implementing co-creation in the higher education context, with particular attention to PETE: frame ESD topics in ways that connect directly to PETE students’ professional identities; integrate ESD instead of treating it as “add-on”; balance openness with goal clarity; foster inclusive, supported collaboration teams; provide structural and leadership support for sustainability. Originality/value This case study focuses on co-creation as an approach to integrate ESD in PETE. It contributes to the literature by systematically addressing enablers and challenges across various stages of co-creation. It provides valuable procedural insights for researchers and practitioners working in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-04-2025-0360
Primary Topic
Sustainability in Higher Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-creation of education for sustainable development (ESD) in higher education – a case study in physical education teacher education (PETE) in Germany

Ulrike Röger-Offergeld, Julia Lohmann, Claudia Augste
International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education
Sustainability in Higher Education
article

Co-creation of education for sustainable development (ESD) in higher education – a case study in physical education teacher education (PETE) in Germany

Ulrike Röger-Offergeld, Julia Lohmann, Claudia Augste
article en

Abstract

Purpose Co-creation is proposed as a method to bridge gaps between policy and practice, such as implementing education for sustainable development (ESD) across educational areas. While generally applied in higher education, its systematic use to implement ESD in higher education, and particularly in physical education teacher education (PETE), remains underexplored. This case study aims to examines co-created PETE courses as well as enablers and challenges to co-creative integration of ESD in PETE at a German university. Design/methodology/approach Project documents outlined the types, learning objectives and contents of co-created measures for PETE. Semi-structured interviews with members of the collaboration team (three students, six teacher educators, head of institute) and three teacher educators not involved in co-creation provided insights into enabling and challenging factors of co-creation. Qualitative content analysis identified key factors during co-ideation, co-design and co-implementation. Findings Five measures with a focus on ESD-specific content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge and key sustainability competences were co-designed, with three co-implemented. Enablers included individual motivation linked to ESD’s societal relevance, alignment of ESD and PETE, a diverse collaboration team, equal participation, high ownership of specific measures, supportive leadership and clear yet flexible processes. Challenges included perceived low ESD relevance in PETE, limited ownership of overall project, low student and staff involvement and acceptance, curriculum and time constraints. Practical implications Drawing on the results, this study suggests the following recommendations for implementing co-creation in the higher education context, with particular attention to PETE: frame ESD topics in ways that connect directly to PETE students’ professional identities; integrate ESD instead of treating it as “add-on”; balance openness with goal clarity; foster inclusive, supported collaboration teams; provide structural and leadership support for sustainability. Originality/value This case study focuses on co-creation as an approach to integrate ESD in PETE. It contributes to the literature by systematically addressing enablers and challenges across various stages of co-creation. It provides valuable procedural insights for researchers and practitioners working in higher education.

International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education
University of Augsburg (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Sustainability in Higher Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.