EVENS (Evaluation Nursing Students): A Mobile Application to Enhance Nursing Students’ Clinical Competence and Self-Efficacy—A Quasi-Experimental Study

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Evaluation of students in practicums is essential in their training process. Mobile technologies enable formative assessments in training, enhance feedback, and improve students' clinical competence and self-efficacy. Nevertheless, in the absence of previous evidence, their effects on clinical learning must be evaluated with rigor and caution. We aimed to evaluate the improvement in nursing students' clinical competence and self-efficacy during their clinical practicums using the Evaluation Nursing Student (EVENS) application. <b>Methods</b>: A quasi-experimental design with non-equivalent control and intervention groups was adopted. Participants were not randomly assigned. The inclusion criterion was enrolment for the Supervised Practicum II course in the Nursing degree course at University X. Students agreeing to use the EVENS application during their Supervised Practicum II were assigned to the intervention group. The primary outcomes were student competence and self-efficacy, and the secondary outcome was the usability of the application. The analysis included a comparison of the pre- and post-intervention means of the intervention and control groups using Student's <i>t</i>-tests. <b>Results</b>: One hundred and forty-nine mostly female (<i>n</i> = 137, 91.9%) students participated in the study. Forty-eight were assigned to the intervention group and 101 to the control group. No statistically significant differences regarding clinical competence or self-efficacy were found between the groups. Tutors rated the application's usability with an average of 3.8 out of 5. <b>Conclusions</b>: The use of the EVENS application did not improve the primary outcomes. Although it was positively received by tutors as supportive of their role in training students engaged in clinical practicums.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Reports
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep16030083
Primary Topic
Health Education and Validation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EVENS (Evaluation Nursing Students): A Mobile Application to Enhance Nursing Students’ Clinical Competence and Self-Efficacy—A Quasi-Experimental Study

Francisco Félix Caballero-Díaz, María Isabel Guzmán-Almagro, M.T. González‐Gil, Miriam Leñero-Cirujano et al.
Nursing Reports
Health Education and Validation
article

EVENS (Evaluation Nursing Students): A Mobile Application to Enhance Nursing Students’ Clinical Competence and Self-Efficacy—A Quasi-Experimental Study

Francisco Félix Caballero-Díaz, María Isabel Guzmán-Almagro, M.T. González‐Gil, Miriam Leñero-Cirujano, Rosa María Carro, Pablo Izaguirre-García, Cristina Oter-Quintana, Ana Isabel Parro-Moreno, María Teresa Alcolea-Cosín, Carmen García-García
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Evaluation of students in practicums is essential in their training process. Mobile technologies enable formative assessments in training, enhance feedback, and improve students' clinical competence and self-efficacy. Nevertheless, in the absence of previous evidence, their effects on clinical learning must be evaluated with rigor and caution. We aimed to evaluate the improvement in nursing students' clinical competence and self-efficacy during their clinical practicums using the Evaluation Nursing Student (EVENS) application. <b>Methods</b>: A quasi-experimental design with non-equivalent control and intervention groups was adopted. Participants were not randomly assigned. The inclusion criterion was enrolment for the Supervised Practicum II course in the Nursing degree course at University X. Students agreeing to use the EVENS application during their Supervised Practicum II were assigned to the intervention group. The primary outcomes were student competence and self-efficacy, and the secondary outcome was the usability of the application. The analysis included a comparison of the pre- and post-intervention means of the intervention and control groups using Student's <i>t</i>-tests. <b>Results</b>: One hundred and forty-nine mostly female (<i>n</i> = 137, 91.9%) students participated in the study. Forty-eight were assigned to the intervention group and 101 to the control group. No statistically significant differences regarding clinical competence or self-efficacy were found between the groups. Tutors rated the application's usability with an average of 3.8 out of 5. <b>Conclusions</b>: The use of the EVENS application did not improve the primary outcomes. Although it was positively received by tutors as supportive of their role in training students engaged in clinical practicums.

Nursing ReportsVol. 16(3)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Health Education and Validation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.