Entangled nights: The affective, material, and cultural politics of co-sleeping

Co-sleeping, where caregiver-infant dyads share a sleeping surface, is a culturally embedded caregiving practice across many societies. Despite its benefits, co-sleeping challenges Western norms and raises SUDI concerns. Existing research often examines co-sleeping through narrow lenses, reducing nighttime care to binary oppositions of safe versus unsafe. Addressing this gap, this study explored co-sleeping practices of 16 mother-baby dyads in Aotearoa New Zealand using new materialism and assemblage theory. Data from interviews and digital diaries revealed that co-sleeping emerges not solely from individual choice but from complex interactions between material arrangements, embodied experiences, and institutional forces. Three paradoxes emerged: vigilant rest, the safety paradox, and the good mother paradox. Findings demonstrated that co-sleeping is a dynamic process of negotiation among bodies, materials, spaces, and social forces, with implications for strength-based, family-tailored, and culturally responsive infant sleep safety strategies that move beyond one-size-fits-all recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Psychology
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053261419693
Primary Topic
Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Entangled nights: The affective, material, and cultural politics of co-sleeping

Eva Neely, Kamila Hoffmann-Dumienski
Journal of Health Psychology
Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
article

Entangled nights: The affective, material, and cultural politics of co-sleeping

Eva Neely, Kamila Hoffmann-Dumienski
article en

Abstract

Co-sleeping, where caregiver-infant dyads share a sleeping surface, is a culturally embedded caregiving practice across many societies. Despite its benefits, co-sleeping challenges Western norms and raises SUDI concerns. Existing research often examines co-sleeping through narrow lenses, reducing nighttime care to binary oppositions of safe versus unsafe. Addressing this gap, this study explored co-sleeping practices of 16 mother-baby dyads in Aotearoa New Zealand using new materialism and assemblage theory. Data from interviews and digital diaries revealed that co-sleeping emerges not solely from individual choice but from complex interactions between material arrangements, embodied experiences, and institutional forces. Three paradoxes emerged: vigilant rest, the safety paradox, and the good mother paradox. Findings demonstrated that co-sleeping is a dynamic process of negotiation among bodies, materials, spaces, and social forces, with implications for strength-based, family-tailored, and culturally responsive infant sleep safety strategies that move beyond one-size-fits-all recommendations.

Journal of Health Psychology
Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.