Modeling wastewater treatment by mobile biofilm and activated sludge processes configured for biological nutrient removal at 10 and 20 °C

ABSTRACT Hybrid biological wastewater treatment (WWT) processes contain biofilms and suspended biomass. Biofilms and carriers are retained by physical selectors, while suspended biomass is managed by its controlled withdrawal and recirculation. Compared with activated sludge (AS) processes, hybrid biological WWT processes require a smaller physical footprint and, in the case of mobile organic biofilms (MOBs), accumulate biomass with exceptional settling characteristics. This article presents a model-based comparison of MOB and AS processes for BOD5, NH4-N, and PO4-P removal. Process, numerical 1D-biofilm, geometric, migrating-carrier, and hybrid-bioreactor submodels were applied simultaneously. At 10 °C, only the MOB process achieved treatment criteria because slow-growing nitrifiers and phosphorus-storing heterotrophic bacteria were retained in biofilms. The hybrid MOB process increased suspended-growth solids retention time due to biofilm detachment and prevented secondary clarifier overload through superior biomass settleability. Biofilm carriers caused the total suspended solids concentrations in the MOB process to be greater than those in AS, but MOB had less total active biomass. For the modeled biofilm, layers near the biofilm's surface were dominated by phosphorus-storing and ordinary heterotrophic bacteria and protein extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and carbohydrate-EPS; layers near the substratum were dominated by polyphosphates and nonbiodegradable endogenous decay products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Science & Technology
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2026.217
Primary Topic
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling wastewater treatment by mobile biofilm and activated sludge processes configured for biological nutrient removal at 10 and 20 °C

Joshua P. Boltz, José Jimenez, Alex Danuser, Bruce E. Rittmann
Water Science & Technology
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
article

Modeling wastewater treatment by mobile biofilm and activated sludge processes configured for biological nutrient removal at 10 and 20 °C

Joshua P. Boltz, José Jimenez, Alex Danuser, Bruce E. Rittmann
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Hybrid biological wastewater treatment (WWT) processes contain biofilms and suspended biomass. Biofilms and carriers are retained by physical selectors, while suspended biomass is managed by its controlled withdrawal and recirculation. Compared with activated sludge (AS) processes, hybrid biological WWT processes require a smaller physical footprint and, in the case of mobile organic biofilms (MOBs), accumulate biomass with exceptional settling characteristics. This article presents a model-based comparison of MOB and AS processes for BOD5, NH4-N, and PO4-P removal. Process, numerical 1D-biofilm, geometric, migrating-carrier, and hybrid-bioreactor submodels were applied simultaneously. At 10 °C, only the MOB process achieved treatment criteria because slow-growing nitrifiers and phosphorus-storing heterotrophic bacteria were retained in biofilms. The hybrid MOB process increased suspended-growth solids retention time due to biofilm detachment and prevented secondary clarifier overload through superior biomass settleability. Biofilm carriers caused the total suspended solids concentrations in the MOB process to be greater than those in AS, but MOB had less total active biomass. For the modeled biofilm, layers near the biofilm's surface were dominated by phosphorus-storing and ordinary heterotrophic bacteria and protein extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and carbohydrate-EPS; layers near the substratum were dominated by polyphosphates and nonbiodegradable endogenous decay products.

Water Science & TechnologyVol. 93(5)
The Mount (GB), Gaston College (US), Brown and Caldwell (United States) (US), Arizona State University (US)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.