Managerial decision-making and AI: A taxonomy of AI collaboration orientations and strategic integration

Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant promise for enhancing business decision-making, yet managers differ in their perceptions and approaches to collaborating with AI systems. Organizations thus face a managerial challenge: how to account for individual AI collaboration orientations to maximize the benefits of human–AI collaboration while addressing fears of replacement. This study develops a taxonomy of AI collaboration orientations among marketing decision-makers, based on survey data from 472 professionals. A person-centered analysis reveals four distinct profiles: AI Trailblazers, who view AI as a strategic partner; AI Strategists, who balance AI insights with human judgement; Pragmatic Adopters, who value efficiency but remain cautious; and AI Skeptics, who express concerns over sense of control and transparency. These orientations are shaped by collaboration preferences, sense of control, explainability, and organisational support. We also find that managers in organizations that promote AI experimentation report greater satisfaction with market performance. This study advances research on AI trust, human–AI collaboration, and managerial technology adoption. The taxonomy offers firms a practical tool to assess and support AI collaboration readiness and to develop adaptive leadership in an evolving digital environment. • Managerial differences in approaching AI collaboration remain underexplored. • Four distinct AI collaboration orientations emerge among marketing decision-makers. • AI Trailblazers and AI Strategists show the highest levels of strategic engagement. • Collaboration preferences, agency, and transparency shape adoption mindsets. • Organizational support for AI experimentation boosts performance satisfaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technovation
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2026.103519
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managerial decision-making and AI: A taxonomy of AI collaboration orientations and strategic integration

Piotr Gaczek, Grzegorz Leszczyński, Andréas Munzel
Technovation
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Managerial decision-making and AI: A taxonomy of AI collaboration orientations and strategic integration

Piotr Gaczek, Grzegorz Leszczyński, Andréas Munzel
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant promise for enhancing business decision-making, yet managers differ in their perceptions and approaches to collaborating with AI systems. Organizations thus face a managerial challenge: how to account for individual AI collaboration orientations to maximize the benefits of human–AI collaboration while addressing fears of replacement. This study develops a taxonomy of AI collaboration orientations among marketing decision-makers, based on survey data from 472 professionals. A person-centered analysis reveals four distinct profiles: AI Trailblazers, who view AI as a strategic partner; AI Strategists, who balance AI insights with human judgement; Pragmatic Adopters, who value efficiency but remain cautious; and AI Skeptics, who express concerns over sense of control and transparency. These orientations are shaped by collaboration preferences, sense of control, explainability, and organisational support. We also find that managers in organizations that promote AI experimentation report greater satisfaction with market performance. This study advances research on AI trust, human–AI collaboration, and managerial technology adoption. The taxonomy offers firms a practical tool to assess and support AI collaboration readiness and to develop adaptive leadership in an evolving digital environment. • Managerial differences in approaching AI collaboration remain underexplored. • Four distinct AI collaboration orientations emerge among marketing decision-makers. • AI Trailblazers and AI Strategists show the highest levels of strategic engagement. • Collaboration preferences, agency, and transparency shape adoption mindsets. • Organizational support for AI experimentation boosts performance satisfaction.

TechnovationVol. 153
Poznań University of Economics and Business (PL), Vlerick Business School (BE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.