Life Cycle Assessment as a Catalyst for Environmental Transformation: A Systematic Review (2018–2024)

The growing adoption of life cycle assessment (LCA) across productive sectors has yet to be systematically examined in terms of its capacity to drive environmental transformation beyond methodological assessment. This systematic review (2018–2024) explores how LCA functions as a catalyst for environmental change in products, processes, and systems. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, 657 records from Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect were screened, yielding 50 high-quality studies assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool; bibliometric network analysis via VOSviewer complemented qualitative thematic synthesis. Findings reveal a shift from conventional standardized life cycle assessment methodologies toward integrated frameworks such as LCSA, incorporating regionalized characterization factors, uncertainty quantification, and digital technologies. Applications across energy, agri-food, manufacturing, construction, and waste management support SDGs 12, 13, and 9 by identifying hotspots, comparing technologies, and informing policy. However, inconsistencies in functional units, system boundaries, and impact methods, alongside limited social and economic integration, restrict cross-study comparability. The evidence indicates that LCA is evolving from an assessment tool into a deliberative decision-making infrastructure, requiring harmonized yet context-specific methodologies and robust social indicators for equitable implementation. This review offers original value by combining bibliometric and critical methodological synthesis to map how life-cycle thinking induces environmental transformation, revealing the gap between evaluative capacity and transformative implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18052284
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life Cycle Assessment as a Catalyst for Environmental Transformation: A Systematic Review (2018–2024)

Elmer Benites Alfaro, Danny Alonso Lizarzaburu Aguinaga
Sustainability
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Life Cycle Assessment as a Catalyst for Environmental Transformation: A Systematic Review (2018–2024)

Elmer Benites Alfaro, Danny Alonso Lizarzaburu Aguinaga
article en

Abstract

The growing adoption of life cycle assessment (LCA) across productive sectors has yet to be systematically examined in terms of its capacity to drive environmental transformation beyond methodological assessment. This systematic review (2018–2024) explores how LCA functions as a catalyst for environmental change in products, processes, and systems. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, 657 records from Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect were screened, yielding 50 high-quality studies assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool; bibliometric network analysis via VOSviewer complemented qualitative thematic synthesis. Findings reveal a shift from conventional standardized life cycle assessment methodologies toward integrated frameworks such as LCSA, incorporating regionalized characterization factors, uncertainty quantification, and digital technologies. Applications across energy, agri-food, manufacturing, construction, and waste management support SDGs 12, 13, and 9 by identifying hotspots, comparing technologies, and informing policy. However, inconsistencies in functional units, system boundaries, and impact methods, alongside limited social and economic integration, restrict cross-study comparability. The evidence indicates that LCA is evolving from an assessment tool into a deliberative decision-making infrastructure, requiring harmonized yet context-specific methodologies and robust social indicators for equitable implementation. This review offers original value by combining bibliometric and critical methodological synthesis to map how life-cycle thinking induces environmental transformation, revealing the gap between evaluative capacity and transformative implementation.

SustainabilityVol. 18(5)
Universidad César Vallejo (PE)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.