Decoding Uncertainty Quantification for Oncology—An Illustration Using Radiomics

While AI models are developed in oncology for predicting different clinical outcomes, the focus is often on accuracy and many fail to adequately communicate the degree of certainty in these predictions. To improve clinical decision-making in oncology, this work introduces the idea of uncertainty quantification (UQ) for AI models using an illustrative example. Our goal is to help radiologists and oncologists better understand prediction reliability by integrating UQ. Our illustrative example is a Radiomics Risk Model (RM) for Thymic Epithelial Tumours, developed to provide a basic understanding of the mechanism to evaluate the degree to which individual patient data matches the training set. The study demonstrates the concept of measuring uncertainty in artificial intelligence (AI) models using a simple example of distance measures within the feature space and example cases where uncertainty is addressed with probable causes. The paper highlights specifically where the clinicians may need more information to improve their confidence in their AI-driven assessments for clinical diagnostics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16050700
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding Uncertainty Quantification for Oncology—An Illustration Using Radiomics

Hannah Thomas, Amal Joseph Varghese, Florian van Daalen, Rianne Fijten et al.
Diagnostics
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Decoding Uncertainty Quantification for Oncology—An Illustration Using Radiomics

Hannah Thomas, Amal Joseph Varghese, Florian van Daalen, Rianne Fijten, Aparna Irodi, B. K. Sasidharan, Andre Dekker, Leonard Wee, C. Praveenraj
article en

Abstract

While AI models are developed in oncology for predicting different clinical outcomes, the focus is often on accuracy and many fail to adequately communicate the degree of certainty in these predictions. To improve clinical decision-making in oncology, this work introduces the idea of uncertainty quantification (UQ) for AI models using an illustrative example. Our goal is to help radiologists and oncologists better understand prediction reliability by integrating UQ. Our illustrative example is a Radiomics Risk Model (RM) for Thymic Epithelial Tumours, developed to provide a basic understanding of the mechanism to evaluate the degree to which individual patient data matches the training set. The study demonstrates the concept of measuring uncertainty in artificial intelligence (AI) models using a simple example of distance measures within the feature space and example cases where uncertainty is addressed with probable causes. The paper highlights specifically where the clinicians may need more information to improve their confidence in their AI-driven assessments for clinical diagnostics.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(5)
Christian Medical College, Vellore (IN), Maastricht University (NL), Maastro Clinic (NL)
Universiteit Maastricht, University of Surrey
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.