Energy and Emission Penalties Associated with Air and Fuel Filter Degradation in a Light-Duty Vehicle Under Real Driving Emission Conditions

This study quantifies the effect of air and fuel filter restriction on fuel consumption, regulated pollutants (CO and HC), and CO2 greenhouse gas emissions under real driving conditions in a hilly high-altitude environment. Four filter configurations were evaluated: clean air filter–clean fuel filter (CAF–CFF, reference), dirty air filter–clean fuel filter (DAF–CFF), clean air filter–dirty fuel filter (CAF–DFF), and dirty air filter–dirty fuel filter (DAF–DFF). Each test was repeated three times over the same RDE route in Quito (≈2100–2900 m). Fuel consumption was estimated from ECU-based signals, and CO2 emission factors and regulated pollutant (CO and HC) emission factors were computed from measured exhaust concentrations and distance normalization. Results were analyzed by RDE section (urban, rural, motorway) and expressed as percent changes relative to the reference configuration to directly isolate filter restriction effects. Relative to CAF–CFF, DAF–CFF produced the largest increase in average fuel consumption (+7.2%) and the largest urban CO2 penalty (+22.7%), indicating a strong efficiency sensitivity to intake restriction under transient operation. CAF–DFF increased average fuel consumption by 6% and produced the strongest motorway penalties for CO (+77.3%) and HC (+44.4%), suggesting that fuel delivery restriction has a stronger influence on incomplete oxidation products under sustained higher load. The combined restriction (DAF–DFF) showed non-additive responses depending on the operating regime. Random Forest models were trained to estimate CO2, CO, and HC, achieving R2 values of 0.8571, 0.8229, and 0.7690, respectively, while multiple linear regression achieved an R2 of 0.852 for fuel consumption. The proposed approach supports data-driven monitoring of filter restriction effects under real driving operation, while acknowledging that fuel consumption and CO2 are obtained through different measurement and conversion paths and may not yield identical percent changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19051180
Primary Topic
Vehicle emissions and performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy and Emission Penalties Associated with Air and Fuel Filter Degradation in a Light-Duty Vehicle Under Real Driving Emission Conditions

Juan José Molina-Campoverde, Edgar Stalin García García, Anthony Alexis Gualli Pilamunga
Energies
Vehicle emissions and performance
article

Energy and Emission Penalties Associated with Air and Fuel Filter Degradation in a Light-Duty Vehicle Under Real Driving Emission Conditions

Juan José Molina-Campoverde, Edgar Stalin García García, Anthony Alexis Gualli Pilamunga
article en

Abstract

This study quantifies the effect of air and fuel filter restriction on fuel consumption, regulated pollutants (CO and HC), and CO2 greenhouse gas emissions under real driving conditions in a hilly high-altitude environment. Four filter configurations were evaluated: clean air filter–clean fuel filter (CAF–CFF, reference), dirty air filter–clean fuel filter (DAF–CFF), clean air filter–dirty fuel filter (CAF–DFF), and dirty air filter–dirty fuel filter (DAF–DFF). Each test was repeated three times over the same RDE route in Quito (≈2100–2900 m). Fuel consumption was estimated from ECU-based signals, and CO2 emission factors and regulated pollutant (CO and HC) emission factors were computed from measured exhaust concentrations and distance normalization. Results were analyzed by RDE section (urban, rural, motorway) and expressed as percent changes relative to the reference configuration to directly isolate filter restriction effects. Relative to CAF–CFF, DAF–CFF produced the largest increase in average fuel consumption (+7.2%) and the largest urban CO2 penalty (+22.7%), indicating a strong efficiency sensitivity to intake restriction under transient operation. CAF–DFF increased average fuel consumption by 6% and produced the strongest motorway penalties for CO (+77.3%) and HC (+44.4%), suggesting that fuel delivery restriction has a stronger influence on incomplete oxidation products under sustained higher load. The combined restriction (DAF–DFF) showed non-additive responses depending on the operating regime. Random Forest models were trained to estimate CO2, CO, and HC, achieving R2 values of 0.8571, 0.8229, and 0.7690, respectively, while multiple linear regression achieved an R2 of 0.852 for fuel consumption. The proposed approach supports data-driven monitoring of filter restriction effects under real driving operation, while acknowledging that fuel consumption and CO2 are obtained through different measurement and conversion paths and may not yield identical percent changes.

EnergiesVol. 19(5)
Politecnica Salesiana University (EC)
Universidad Politécnica Salesiana del Ecuador
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Vehicle emissions and performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.