Partners’ childbirth experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic – findings from the Swedish COPE prospective cohort study

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted maternity care and limited partner involvement during childbirth. While partners play an important role during pregnancy and birth, their own experiences remain understudied. This study aimed to measure partners’ childbirth experience during the COVID-19 pandemic and examine associations with relevant variables. This cross-sectional, prospective cohort study was part of the Swedish multicentre COVID-19 during Pregnancy and Early Childhood Study (COPE). Data were collected through electronic questionnaires and national health and quality registers. Childbirth experience was measured using the Fathers for the First Time Questionnaire (FTFQ), comprising of four dimensions: ‘Worry’ (concerns about safety and emotional reactions), ‘Information’ (perceived adequacy and relevance of information), ‘Acceptance’ (feeling welcomed and acknowledged by staff), and ‘Emotional support’ (experiences of guidance and reassurance during birth). Hierarchical multiple linear regression was used to examine associations with selected variables. A total of 365 partners (54.5% first-time parents) were recruited between June 2020 and December 2022. Mean (SD) FTFQ scores (range 0–4, lower scores indicate a more positive experience) were: ‘Worry’ 2.1 (0.7), ‘Information’ 1.7 (0.5), ‘Acceptance’ 1.3 (0.4), and ‘Emotional support’ 2.1 (0.7). Partners who did not experience the birth as expected, were exposed to a complicated birth, or reported symptoms of anxiety and/or depression during pregnancy had more negative childbirth experiences, particularly regarding ‘Worry’ and ‘Information’. During the COVID-19 pandemic, partners who reported unmet expectations of childbirth, exposure to birth complications, or antenatal symptoms of anxiety and/or depression appeared to be particularly vulnerable to more negative childbirth experiences, especially in the dimensions ‘Worry’ and ‘Information’. These findings underscore the importance of identifying psychological vulnerability and unmet informational needs among partners during pregnancy and birth, and of fostering communication strategies that promote inclusion and emotional safety in the childbirth setting. NCTO4433364 06/02/2020.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-026-08862-3
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Partners’ childbirth experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic – findings from the Swedish COPE prospective cohort study

Ylva Carlsson, Verena Sengpiel, Anna Sand, Linda Hjertberg et al.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
article

Partners’ childbirth experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic – findings from the Swedish COPE prospective cohort study

Ylva Carlsson, Verena Sengpiel, Anna Sand, Linda Hjertberg, Mehreen Zaigham, Marie Inger Blomberg, Karolina Lindén, Gustaf Biasoletto, Sofie Arnkil, Johanna Berg, Sara Isell, Eva Uhlander, Anna-Karin Wikström
article en

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted maternity care and limited partner involvement during childbirth. While partners play an important role during pregnancy and birth, their own experiences remain understudied. This study aimed to measure partners’ childbirth experience during the COVID-19 pandemic and examine associations with relevant variables. This cross-sectional, prospective cohort study was part of the Swedish multicentre COVID-19 during Pregnancy and Early Childhood Study (COPE). Data were collected through electronic questionnaires and national health and quality registers. Childbirth experience was measured using the Fathers for the First Time Questionnaire (FTFQ), comprising of four dimensions: ‘Worry’ (concerns about safety and emotional reactions), ‘Information’ (perceived adequacy and relevance of information), ‘Acceptance’ (feeling welcomed and acknowledged by staff), and ‘Emotional support’ (experiences of guidance and reassurance during birth). Hierarchical multiple linear regression was used to examine associations with selected variables. A total of 365 partners (54.5% first-time parents) were recruited between June 2020 and December 2022. Mean (SD) FTFQ scores (range 0–4, lower scores indicate a more positive experience) were: ‘Worry’ 2.1 (0.7), ‘Information’ 1.7 (0.5), ‘Acceptance’ 1.3 (0.4), and ‘Emotional support’ 2.1 (0.7). Partners who did not experience the birth as expected, were exposed to a complicated birth, or reported symptoms of anxiety and/or depression during pregnancy had more negative childbirth experiences, particularly regarding ‘Worry’ and ‘Information’. During the COVID-19 pandemic, partners who reported unmet expectations of childbirth, exposure to birth complications, or antenatal symptoms of anxiety and/or depression appeared to be particularly vulnerable to more negative childbirth experiences, especially in the dimensions ‘Worry’ and ‘Information’. These findings underscore the importance of identifying psychological vulnerability and unmet informational needs among partners during pregnancy and birth, and of fostering communication strategies that promote inclusion and emotional safety in the childbirth setting. NCTO4433364 06/02/2020.

BMC Pregnancy and ChildbirthVol. 26(1)
Linköping University (SE), Uppsala University (SE), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Uppsala University Hospital (SE), Lund University (SE), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Region Västra Götaland (SE), NU Hospital Group (SE), Östersunds Hospital (SE), Skåne University Hospital (SE), Ryhov Hospital Jönköping (SE), Vrinnevisjukhuset i Norrköping (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.