Comparative Study on Pore Characteristics and Methane Adsorption Capacity of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Shales with Different Lithofacies

In this study, shale samples with diverse lithofacies from the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Fuling Field were investigated to evaluate the variations in pore characteristics and methane adsorption capacity (MAC) of different shale lithofacies. A set of experiments were performed, such as total organic carbon (TOC) content, X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission–scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), low-pressure gas (CO2/N2) adsorption, and high-pressure methane adsorption. Combined with TOC content and mineral composition, three types of shale lithofacies were identified, including organic-rich (OR) argillaceous-rich siliceous (S-3) shale lithofacies, organic-moderate (OM) argillaceous/siliceous mixed (M-2) shale lithofacies, and organic-lean (OL) siliceous-rich argillaceous (CM-1) shale lithofacies. Through detailed comparative analyses, we found that OR S-3 shales possess the maximum TOC content, the most developed heterogeneous organic micro-mesopores, the largest pore volume (PV), and the highest pore surface area (PSA); consequently, they display the strongest MAC. Conversely, OL CM-1 shales have the lowest TOC content and the highest clay content, and thus the smallest PSA and the poorest methane adsorption performance. In conclusion, considering the excellent gas storage potential, sustained shale gas production, and brittle response to hydraulic fracturing, OR S-3 shales are superior to shale gas exploration and exploitation compared with OM M-2 and OL CM-1 shales.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fractal and Fractional
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract10030154
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study on Pore Characteristics and Methane Adsorption Capacity of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Shales with Different Lithofacies

Yuzuo Liu, Zhiguo Shu, Lanpu Chen, Wanzhong Shi et al.
Fractal and Fractional
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
article

Comparative Study on Pore Characteristics and Methane Adsorption Capacity of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Shales with Different Lithofacies

Yuzuo Liu, Zhiguo Shu, Lanpu Chen, Wanzhong Shi, Xiaoming Zhang, Yi-Xiang Wang, Lin Meng, Changcheng Han, Xiaomei Zhang, Hao Chen
article en

Abstract

In this study, shale samples with diverse lithofacies from the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Fuling Field were investigated to evaluate the variations in pore characteristics and methane adsorption capacity (MAC) of different shale lithofacies. A set of experiments were performed, such as total organic carbon (TOC) content, X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission–scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), low-pressure gas (CO2/N2) adsorption, and high-pressure methane adsorption. Combined with TOC content and mineral composition, three types of shale lithofacies were identified, including organic-rich (OR) argillaceous-rich siliceous (S-3) shale lithofacies, organic-moderate (OM) argillaceous/siliceous mixed (M-2) shale lithofacies, and organic-lean (OL) siliceous-rich argillaceous (CM-1) shale lithofacies. Through detailed comparative analyses, we found that OR S-3 shales possess the maximum TOC content, the most developed heterogeneous organic micro-mesopores, the largest pore volume (PV), and the highest pore surface area (PSA); consequently, they display the strongest MAC. Conversely, OL CM-1 shales have the lowest TOC content and the highest clay content, and thus the smallest PSA and the poorest methane adsorption performance. In conclusion, considering the excellent gas storage potential, sustained shale gas production, and brittle response to hydraulic fracturing, OR S-3 shales are superior to shale gas exploration and exploitation compared with OM M-2 and OL CM-1 shales.

Fractal and FractionalVol. 10(3)
Sinopec (China) (CN), Yangtze University (CN), China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN), China University of Geosciences (CN), Xinjiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.