Reno-protective effects of statins among patients with chronic kidney disease in Hong Kong: a target trial emulation

Background: Many existing randomised controlled trials lack sufficient power to assess primary kidney outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate whether statin therapy offers a clinically meaningful reno-protective effect in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, electronic health records in Hong Kong were extracted to perform sequential target trial emulation. Eligible adults (aged 18+ years) with CKD who met the indication for statin initiation between Jan 1, 2008 and Dec 31, 2017 were included; those with history of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 were excluded. Participants were categorised as statin initiators or non-initiators at each calendar month during inclusion period, where statin initiators were propensity score-matched with non-initiators. Follow-up data were collected for all participants until the occurrence of outcomes, death, loss to follow-up (2 years after last records), or the end of data availability (Dec 31, 2022), whichever occurred first. The hazard ratio (HR) of all-cause mortality, eGFR deterioration (eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2, ≥30% eGFR decline, and ≥50% eGFR decline) and composite outcomes (all-cause mortality, eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2, and ≥50% eGFR decline) was estimated by pooled logistic regression using intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) approach. Findings: 1,437,014 eligible person-trials were identified (statin initiators n = 30,907; non-initiators n = 1,406,107), from which 30,892 statin initiators and 108,380 non-initiators were included after propensity-score matching. Relative to non-initiators, significant risk reduction was found among statin initiators in all-cause mortality (HR [95% confidence interval (CI)], ITT: 0.97 [0.95–0.98]; PP: 0.91 [0.88–0.93]), progression to eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 (ITT: 0.91 [0.89–0.93]; PP: 0.77 [0.74–0.80]), ≥50% eGFR decline (ITT: 0.95 [0.93–0.98]; PP: 0.89 [0.84–0.93]), and composite outcomes (ITT: 0.96 [0.94–0.97]; PP: 0.90 [0.88–0.92]). Statin therapy initiation was also associated significantly with reduced risk of ≥30% eGFR decline using PP approach (0.94 [0.92–0.96]). Interpretation: Over a 10-year follow-up period, initiating statin therapy in patients with CKD was associated with a small yet significant decrease in all-cause mortality and a modest reno-protective effect. Future research should aim to clarify the effects of statin intensity, duration, and adherence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University)
Published
2026-02-12
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reno-protective effects of statins among patients with chronic kidney disease in Hong Kong: a target trial emulation

Ivy Lynn Mak, Franco Wing Tak Cheng, Emily Tsui Yee Tse, Zoey Cho Ting Wong et al.
Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University)
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
article

Reno-protective effects of statins among patients with chronic kidney disease in Hong Kong: a target trial emulation

Ivy Lynn Mak, Franco Wing Tak Cheng, Emily Tsui Yee Tse, Zoey Cho Ting Wong, Eric Yuk Fai Wan, Sydney Chi WaI Tang, Ian Chi Kei Wong
article en

Abstract

Background: Many existing randomised controlled trials lack sufficient power to assess primary kidney outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate whether statin therapy offers a clinically meaningful reno-protective effect in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, electronic health records in Hong Kong were extracted to perform sequential target trial emulation. Eligible adults (aged 18+ years) with CKD who met the indication for statin initiation between Jan 1, 2008 and Dec 31, 2017 were included; those with history of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 were excluded. Participants were categorised as statin initiators or non-initiators at each calendar month during inclusion period, where statin initiators were propensity score-matched with non-initiators. Follow-up data were collected for all participants until the occurrence of outcomes, death, loss to follow-up (2 years after last records), or the end of data availability (Dec 31, 2022), whichever occurred first. The hazard ratio (HR) of all-cause mortality, eGFR deterioration (eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2, ≥30% eGFR decline, and ≥50% eGFR decline) and composite outcomes (all-cause mortality, eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2, and ≥50% eGFR decline) was estimated by pooled logistic regression using intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) approach. Findings: 1,437,014 eligible person-trials were identified (statin initiators n = 30,907; non-initiators n = 1,406,107), from which 30,892 statin initiators and 108,380 non-initiators were included after propensity-score matching. Relative to non-initiators, significant risk reduction was found among statin initiators in all-cause mortality (HR [95% confidence interval (CI)], ITT: 0.97 [0.95–0.98]; PP: 0.91 [0.88–0.93]), progression to eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 (ITT: 0.91 [0.89–0.93]; PP: 0.77 [0.74–0.80]), ≥50% eGFR decline (ITT: 0.95 [0.93–0.98]; PP: 0.89 [0.84–0.93]), and composite outcomes (ITT: 0.96 [0.94–0.97]; PP: 0.90 [0.88–0.92]). Statin therapy initiation was also associated significantly with reduced risk of ≥30% eGFR decline using PP approach (0.94 [0.92–0.96]). Interpretation: Over a 10-year follow-up period, initiating statin therapy in patients with CKD was associated with a small yet significant decrease in all-cause mortality and a modest reno-protective effect. Future research should aim to clarify the effects of statin intensity, duration, and adherence.

Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.