Generalized green and red concepts for artificial intelligence, big data, and information and communication technologies: Multidimensional framework and countermeasures

The rapid expansions of artificial intelligence (AI), big data (BD), and information and communication technologies (ICT) are driving substantial growth in electricity, water, and material demands, with data centers projected to consume 6.7%–12% of U.S. electricity by 2028 (up from 4.4% in 2023) and AI-related water demand estimated at 4–6 billion m 3 annually by 2027. Existing “green AI” and “red AI” discussions have largely emphasized computational efficiency and carbon emissions, providing limited guidance for lifecycle trade-offs, service-versus-use impacts, and broader sustainability externalities beyond energy. To bridge this gap, this paper proposes generalized green AI (GGAI) and generalized red AI (GRAI) and extends the taxonomy to red BD (RBD) and red ICT (RICT) as well as red electronic and electrical engineering (REEE) & red digital technologies (RDT) under a unified Environmental-Economic-Social-Technical/Operational (E/Ec/S/T) framework. Based on representative footprint indicators in the large-model era (electricity, carbon, water, and e-waste), we analyze how risks propagate across AI-BD-ICT stacks and across service-use boundaries. We further organize actionable countermeasures into a four-tier taxonomy aligned with the Environmental-Economic-Social-Technical/Operational framework: metric-level reform for accountability, revision of information and communication technologies design principles and demand shaping, efficiency-oriented LLM development practices (data, model, training, and scaling), and energy-infrastructure transition. The proposed framework operationalizes the Environmental-Economic-Social-Technical/Operational-aligned assessment and intervention prioritization across the AI-BD-ICT stacks, enabling sustainability-by-design without sacrificing utility. • Propose generalized green AI and generalized red AI. • Propose red big data and red ICT. • Analyze planetary crisis by AI. • Outlines relevant countermeasures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Green Technologies and Sustainability
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.grets.2026.100362
Primary Topic
Green IT and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generalized green and red concepts for artificial intelligence, big data, and information and communication technologies: Multidimensional framework and countermeasures

Yixin Xiao, Huamin Fang, Jinsong Wu, Haowei Bi
Green Technologies and Sustainability
Green IT and Sustainability
article

Generalized green and red concepts for artificial intelligence, big data, and information and communication technologies: Multidimensional framework and countermeasures

Yixin Xiao, Huamin Fang, Jinsong Wu, Haowei Bi
article en

Abstract

The rapid expansions of artificial intelligence (AI), big data (BD), and information and communication technologies (ICT) are driving substantial growth in electricity, water, and material demands, with data centers projected to consume 6.7%–12% of U.S. electricity by 2028 (up from 4.4% in 2023) and AI-related water demand estimated at 4–6 billion m 3 annually by 2027. Existing “green AI” and “red AI” discussions have largely emphasized computational efficiency and carbon emissions, providing limited guidance for lifecycle trade-offs, service-versus-use impacts, and broader sustainability externalities beyond energy. To bridge this gap, this paper proposes generalized green AI (GGAI) and generalized red AI (GRAI) and extends the taxonomy to red BD (RBD) and red ICT (RICT) as well as red electronic and electrical engineering (REEE) & red digital technologies (RDT) under a unified Environmental-Economic-Social-Technical/Operational (E/Ec/S/T) framework. Based on representative footprint indicators in the large-model era (electricity, carbon, water, and e-waste), we analyze how risks propagate across AI-BD-ICT stacks and across service-use boundaries. We further organize actionable countermeasures into a four-tier taxonomy aligned with the Environmental-Economic-Social-Technical/Operational framework: metric-level reform for accountability, revision of information and communication technologies design principles and demand shaping, efficiency-oriented LLM development practices (data, model, training, and scaling), and energy-infrastructure transition. The proposed framework operationalizes the Environmental-Economic-Social-Technical/Operational-aligned assessment and intervention prioritization across the AI-BD-ICT stacks, enabling sustainability-by-design without sacrificing utility. • Propose generalized green AI and generalized red AI. • Propose red big data and red ICT. • Analyze planetary crisis by AI. • Outlines relevant countermeasures.

Green Technologies and SustainabilityVol. 4(2)
Guilin University of Electronic Technology (CN), University of Chile (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Green IT and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.