Precautions for polygenic embryo selection: prohibition or cautious use

Polygenic scores derived from inborn genetic variation are expected to predict individuals' complex traits. Preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic scores is already offered to help parents select embryos deemed "healthy" and/or "intelligent", raising ethical concerns. This paper analyzes the implications of polygenic embryo selection and proposes policy responses. Although substantial clinical uncertainty persists, use is likely to expand because parents seek desirable traits. Yet resulting offspring may not meet such expectations due to environmental influences (including parental behavior), offspring's genomes, and their autonomy. These practices risk generating socio-ethical harms, including false expectations, child objectification, and trait-based stigma. Professional societies and policymakers should therefore warn parents about these risks, and consider prohibiting polygenic embryo selection, although they might eventually permit cautious use for serious late-onset diseases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Reproductive Health
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2026.1771127
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Precautions for polygenic embryo selection: prohibition or cautious use

Tetsuya Ishii
Frontiers in Reproductive Health
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Precautions for polygenic embryo selection: prohibition or cautious use

Tetsuya Ishii
article en

Abstract

Polygenic scores derived from inborn genetic variation are expected to predict individuals' complex traits. Preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic scores is already offered to help parents select embryos deemed "healthy" and/or "intelligent", raising ethical concerns. This paper analyzes the implications of polygenic embryo selection and proposes policy responses. Although substantial clinical uncertainty persists, use is likely to expand because parents seek desirable traits. Yet resulting offspring may not meet such expectations due to environmental influences (including parental behavior), offspring's genomes, and their autonomy. These practices risk generating socio-ethical harms, including false expectations, child objectification, and trait-based stigma. Professional societies and policymakers should therefore warn parents about these risks, and consider prohibiting polygenic embryo selection, although they might eventually permit cautious use for serious late-onset diseases.

Frontiers in Reproductive HealthVol. 8
Hokkaido University (JP), Office of Health and Safety (US)
University of New England, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.