The effect of auditors’ informal communication on manager behavior

Abstract Auditors informally communicate with both client managers and fellow audit team members throughout an audit. I examine the separate effects of these informal communications on managers’ strategic behavior using a laboratory experiment in which participants in the roles of auditors and managers interact in a stylized audit setting. I find that informal auditor-manager communication strengthens managers’ social bonds with auditors, which results in fewer aggressive accounting choices by the manager. Moreover, these stronger social bonds result in greater honesty about aggressive accounting choices when they do occur. While informal communication causes auditors to reduce audit effort, I show that the auditors’ choice is appropriate because of the positive influence the managers’ social bonds have on manager behavior, ultimately reducing instances of audit failure. My study demonstrates that auditors can strategically use informal communication with managers to strengthen auditor-manager social bonds that in turn benefit the audit through preferable manager behaviors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Accounting Studies
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-026-09939-2
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of auditors’ informal communication on manager behavior

Emily Kathryn Deng
Review of Accounting Studies
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

The effect of auditors’ informal communication on manager behavior

Emily Kathryn Deng
article en

Abstract

Abstract Auditors informally communicate with both client managers and fellow audit team members throughout an audit. I examine the separate effects of these informal communications on managers’ strategic behavior using a laboratory experiment in which participants in the roles of auditors and managers interact in a stylized audit setting. I find that informal auditor-manager communication strengthens managers’ social bonds with auditors, which results in fewer aggressive accounting choices by the manager. Moreover, these stronger social bonds result in greater honesty about aggressive accounting choices when they do occur. While informal communication causes auditors to reduce audit effort, I show that the auditors’ choice is appropriate because of the positive influence the managers’ social bonds have on manager behavior, ultimately reducing instances of audit failure. My study demonstrates that auditors can strategically use informal communication with managers to strengthen auditor-manager social bonds that in turn benefit the audit through preferable manager behaviors.

Review of Accounting Studies
Baylor University (US)
Baylor University, Ball State University, East Carolina University
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.