Worldwide Evaluation of Cervical Cancer Self-Sampling Devices

Nearly 90% of cervical cancer and related fatalities occur in low-income and middle-income countries and low-resourced areas within developed countries. In the 1980s, self-sampling was introduced to reach this vulnerable population and those with behavioral aversion to clinician-based screening. Currently, dozens of self-sampling devices have been studied for cervical cancer screening. Here, we consolidated data from an extensive peer-reviewed literature search to summarize the prevalence, accuracy, and acceptance rates of cervical cancer screening self-sampling devices worldwide. We focused, when available, on samples detecting high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more. The most studied and commonly accepted devices described in our review include the Evalyn Brush (N=73,986), Delphi Screener (n=28,020), FLOQSwab (N=13,638), Viba-Brush (N=25,565), and Digene Brush (N=12,150). Compared with clinician-based collection, samples derived from self-sampling devices had no significant difference in accurate detection of high-risk HPV. These self-sampling devices have thus been shown to effectively achieve broader global coverage for cervical cancer screening, particularly for limited-access areas. The use of self-sampling devices in populations with low resources and aversion to clinician-based sampling could have a major influence on detection of high-risk HPV and dysplasia, potentially reducing incidence of cervical cancer worldwide.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006179
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Worldwide Evaluation of Cervical Cancer Self-Sampling Devices

Edward K. Maybury, Nathalie Mckenzie, Sarfraz Ahmad
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

Worldwide Evaluation of Cervical Cancer Self-Sampling Devices

Edward K. Maybury, Nathalie Mckenzie, Sarfraz Ahmad
article en

Abstract

Nearly 90% of cervical cancer and related fatalities occur in low-income and middle-income countries and low-resourced areas within developed countries. In the 1980s, self-sampling was introduced to reach this vulnerable population and those with behavioral aversion to clinician-based screening. Currently, dozens of self-sampling devices have been studied for cervical cancer screening. Here, we consolidated data from an extensive peer-reviewed literature search to summarize the prevalence, accuracy, and acceptance rates of cervical cancer screening self-sampling devices worldwide. We focused, when available, on samples detecting high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more. The most studied and commonly accepted devices described in our review include the Evalyn Brush (N=73,986), Delphi Screener (n=28,020), FLOQSwab (N=13,638), Viba-Brush (N=25,565), and Digene Brush (N=12,150). Compared with clinician-based collection, samples derived from self-sampling devices had no significant difference in accurate detection of high-risk HPV. These self-sampling devices have thus been shown to effectively achieve broader global coverage for cervical cancer screening, particularly for limited-access areas. The use of self-sampling devices in populations with low resources and aversion to clinician-based sampling could have a major influence on detection of high-risk HPV and dysplasia, potentially reducing incidence of cervical cancer worldwide.

Obstetrics and Gynecology
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.