Aiming Higher to Test a Bend in the Curve of Biodiversity Loss: The Challenge of Halt‐The‐Loss Targets

Efforts to 'bend the curve' of biodiversity loss involve setting targets to halt declines. Here, we propose an empirical test of such targets. This test states the probability that the rate of change in a biodiversity indicator is greater than or equal to zero. We used a combination of real and simulated data to explore factors affecting test performance. We found that while smoothing had a minimal effect, the outcome depends heavily on the variability and number of species in a dataset. This suggests that thresholds for target acceptance should be set on a case-by-case basis. Adding data for subsequent years could retrospectively change the outcome in a target year. Assessments made with data only up until the target year should therefore be regarded as interim, with the assessment of the target only finalised once subsequent data are also included. We recommend that simulations are used a priori to choose smoothing levels and to set thresholds for accepting a target has been met.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.73157
Primary Topic
Environmental Conservation and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aiming Higher to Test a Bend in the Curve of Biodiversity Loss: The Challenge of Halt‐The‐Loss Targets

Mairenn C. Attwood, Richard D. Gregory, Fiona Burns, Nick J. B. Isaac
Ecology and Evolution
Environmental Conservation and Management
article

Aiming Higher to Test a Bend in the Curve of Biodiversity Loss: The Challenge of Halt‐The‐Loss Targets

Mairenn C. Attwood, Richard D. Gregory, Fiona Burns, Nick J. B. Isaac
article en

Abstract

Efforts to 'bend the curve' of biodiversity loss involve setting targets to halt declines. Here, we propose an empirical test of such targets. This test states the probability that the rate of change in a biodiversity indicator is greater than or equal to zero. We used a combination of real and simulated data to explore factors affecting test performance. We found that while smoothing had a minimal effect, the outcome depends heavily on the variability and number of species in a dataset. This suggests that thresholds for target acceptance should be set on a case-by-case basis. Adding data for subsequent years could retrospectively change the outcome in a target year. Assessments made with data only up until the target year should therefore be regarded as interim, with the assessment of the target only finalised once subsequent data are also included. We recommend that simulations are used a priori to choose smoothing levels and to set thresholds for accepting a target has been met.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 16(3)
University of Cape Town (ZA), University of Cambridge (GB), UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB), Conservation Leadership Programme (GB), University College London (GB)
Cambridge Conservation Initiative, Natural Environment Research Council
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Environmental Conservation and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.