Jigsaw technique: An innovative way to promote cooperative, self-directed learning among 2 <sup>nd</sup> -year medical undergraduates in pharmacology

Objectives: The primary objective of the study was to assess and compare the effectiveness of Jigsaw Technique and Student Seminar during self-directed learning (SDL) sessions. The secondary objective was to evaluate the perception of students towards the Jigsaw technique. Materials and Methods: Two contact sessions of SDL were planned with a gap of 7 days in between so that the students could learn at their own pace and comfort zone. Each contact session was of 2 h duration. In contact session 1, the entire batch of 200 was divided into two groups. The student seminar group served as the control, and the Jigsaw technique served as the test group. The topic ‘Acute Coronary Syndromes’ was chosen and further divided into different subtopics. Students were asked to frame learning objectives, and subtopics were assigned to both groups. Details about the two teaching methods were provided in detail. A gap of 7 days was provided for the learners to find resources, read and contact the facilitator if required for guidance. In contact session 2, a pre-test in the form of multiple-choice questions was conducted for the entire batch, following which the student seminar group made PowerPoint presentations, while the jigsaw group had a mixed group discussion, wherein two experts from each subtopic formed a group and taught peers to provide an overall picture of the topic. The facilitator monitored the peer teaching and cleared doubts, if any. Results: Pre (13.42 ± 6.17) and post-test (16.19 ± 5.32*) scores of the student seminar were compared. Similarly, pre (11.18 ± 6.36) and post-test (17.48 ± 4.40*) scores of Jigsaw were compared. Students’ performance was better in the post-test (* P &lt; 0.0001) in both methods. However, on comparing the post-test scores of both groups, the Jigsaw method showed significant results (17.48 ± 4.40*), as compared to the student seminar (16.19 ± 5.32) ( P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: The Jigsaw technique is a powerful active learning method that enhances cooperative and SDL among medical undergraduates in pharmacology. Integrating the Jigsaw method into SDL sessions can significantly improve learning outcomes and prepare students for collaborative clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/ijpp_86_2025
Primary Topic
Problem and Project Based Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Jigsaw technique: An innovative way to promote cooperative, self-directed learning among 2 nd -year medical undergraduates in pharmacology

Urmila Anil Kagal, Vidya Mahalmani, Nayana Hashilkar
Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology
Problem and Project Based Learning
article

Jigsaw technique: An innovative way to promote cooperative, self-directed learning among 2 nd -year medical undergraduates in pharmacology

Urmila Anil Kagal, Vidya Mahalmani, Nayana Hashilkar
article en

Abstract

Objectives: The primary objective of the study was to assess and compare the effectiveness of Jigsaw Technique and Student Seminar during self-directed learning (SDL) sessions. The secondary objective was to evaluate the perception of students towards the Jigsaw technique. Materials and Methods: Two contact sessions of SDL were planned with a gap of 7 days in between so that the students could learn at their own pace and comfort zone. Each contact session was of 2 h duration. In contact session 1, the entire batch of 200 was divided into two groups. The student seminar group served as the control, and the Jigsaw technique served as the test group. The topic ‘Acute Coronary Syndromes’ was chosen and further divided into different subtopics. Students were asked to frame learning objectives, and subtopics were assigned to both groups. Details about the two teaching methods were provided in detail. A gap of 7 days was provided for the learners to find resources, read and contact the facilitator if required for guidance. In contact session 2, a pre-test in the form of multiple-choice questions was conducted for the entire batch, following which the student seminar group made PowerPoint presentations, while the jigsaw group had a mixed group discussion, wherein two experts from each subtopic formed a group and taught peers to provide an overall picture of the topic. The facilitator monitored the peer teaching and cleared doubts, if any. Results: Pre (13.42 ± 6.17) and post-test (16.19 ± 5.32*) scores of the student seminar were compared. Similarly, pre (11.18 ± 6.36) and post-test (17.48 ± 4.40*) scores of Jigsaw were compared. Students’ performance was better in the post-test (* P &lt; 0.0001) in both methods. However, on comparing the post-test scores of both groups, the Jigsaw method showed significant results (17.48 ± 4.40*), as compared to the student seminar (16.19 ± 5.32) ( P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: The Jigsaw technique is a powerful active learning method that enhances cooperative and SDL among medical undergraduates in pharmacology. Integrating the Jigsaw method into SDL sessions can significantly improve learning outcomes and prepare students for collaborative clinical practice.

Indian Journal of Physiology and PharmacologyVol. 0
Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College (IN), KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Problem and Project Based Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.