Coupled Simulation of Greenhouse Crop Growth and Soil CO2 Emissions Under Variable Irrigation Levels

How to achieve the goal of water–carbon synergistic optimization in greenhouse crop production under water-saving irrigation strategies constitutes a key pathway for the development of protected agriculture. Our study takes muskmelon and tomato with drip irrigation in greenhouses as an example and establishes different irrigation levels based on cumulative surface evaporation (Ep) from a 20 cm pan. Here, four irrigation amounts (0.6 Ep, 0.8 Ep, 1.0 Ep, and 1.2 Ep) were set for muskmelon, and three irrigation amounts (0.5 Ep, 0.7 Ep, and 0.9 Ep) were set for tomato, and then a two-year fixed-site field experiment was conducted. The growth rates of both crops were significantly higher under full-water-supply treatments (M1.0 and M1.2 for muskmelon, T0.9 for tomato) than under water-deficient treatments (M0.8 and M0.6 for muskmelon, T0.5 for tomato) (p < 0.05) at the flowering stage, while the opposite was true at the harvesting stage. More than 85% of root systems were distributed in the soil layer, ranging from 0 to 40 cm, and the average RLD under M1.0 and T0.9 was significantly higher than that under other treatments by 14.3%~27.6% (p < 0.05). Muskmelon yields at 1.0 Ep were 22.9%~45.7% higher than those at 0.6 Ep and 0.8 Ep, while tomato yields peaked at 0.9 Ep and were 17.0%~19.4% higher than those under the other two treatments. Daily average soil CO2 emission fluxes of muskmelon under M1.2 were 9.2%~32.2% higher than those of other treatments respectively, and that of tomato under T0.9 was more than 20% higher than under T0.7 and T0.5 treatments, respectively. The WHCNS-Veg model demonstrated excellent performance in simulating SWC, LAI, and soil CO2 emission fluxes. The RMSE for SWC simulation ranged from 0.013 to 0.022 cm3·cm−3, for LAI simulation, it varied from 0.103 to 0.210 cm2·cm−2, and for soil CO2 emission flux simulation, it changed from 1.057 to 2.188 kg·hm−2. It should be noted that the performance was higher under high irrigation levels than under water deficit levels. These results can provide a scientific basis for optimizing greenhouse irrigation schedules and regulating water–carbon synergy under different water resource conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Horticulturae
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12030269
Primary Topic
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coupled Simulation of Greenhouse Crop Growth and Soil CO2 Emissions Under Variable Irrigation Levels

Feifei Li, Xinyang Liu, Jiahao Cao, Meng Zhang et al.
Horticulturae
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
article

Coupled Simulation of Greenhouse Crop Growth and Soil CO2 Emissions Under Variable Irrigation Levels

Feifei Li, Xinyang Liu, Jiahao Cao, Meng Zhang, Jianhong Ji
article en

Abstract

How to achieve the goal of water–carbon synergistic optimization in greenhouse crop production under water-saving irrigation strategies constitutes a key pathway for the development of protected agriculture. Our study takes muskmelon and tomato with drip irrigation in greenhouses as an example and establishes different irrigation levels based on cumulative surface evaporation (Ep) from a 20 cm pan. Here, four irrigation amounts (0.6 Ep, 0.8 Ep, 1.0 Ep, and 1.2 Ep) were set for muskmelon, and three irrigation amounts (0.5 Ep, 0.7 Ep, and 0.9 Ep) were set for tomato, and then a two-year fixed-site field experiment was conducted. The growth rates of both crops were significantly higher under full-water-supply treatments (M1.0 and M1.2 for muskmelon, T0.9 for tomato) than under water-deficient treatments (M0.8 and M0.6 for muskmelon, T0.5 for tomato) (p < 0.05) at the flowering stage, while the opposite was true at the harvesting stage. More than 85% of root systems were distributed in the soil layer, ranging from 0 to 40 cm, and the average RLD under M1.0 and T0.9 was significantly higher than that under other treatments by 14.3%~27.6% (p < 0.05). Muskmelon yields at 1.0 Ep were 22.9%~45.7% higher than those at 0.6 Ep and 0.8 Ep, while tomato yields peaked at 0.9 Ep and were 17.0%~19.4% higher than those under the other two treatments. Daily average soil CO2 emission fluxes of muskmelon under M1.2 were 9.2%~32.2% higher than those of other treatments respectively, and that of tomato under T0.9 was more than 20% higher than under T0.7 and T0.5 treatments, respectively. The WHCNS-Veg model demonstrated excellent performance in simulating SWC, LAI, and soil CO2 emission fluxes. The RMSE for SWC simulation ranged from 0.013 to 0.022 cm3·cm−3, for LAI simulation, it varied from 0.103 to 0.210 cm2·cm−2, and for soil CO2 emission flux simulation, it changed from 1.057 to 2.188 kg·hm−2. It should be noted that the performance was higher under high irrigation levels than under water deficit levels. These results can provide a scientific basis for optimizing greenhouse irrigation schedules and regulating water–carbon synergy under different water resource conditions.

HorticulturaeVol. 12(3)
North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power (CN), Henan Forestry Vocational College (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.