Trust-building processes in agri-food value chains: Perspectives from Thailand

• Trust is key in coordination of Thai smallholder-based retailer-driven value chains. • Actors invest in trust building and maintenance not assets for business development. • Trust-based ties stabilize trade but reinforce power asymmetries. • The combination of trust and power asymmetry leads to lock-in, limiting upgrading. • Relational governance calls for new strategies in informal agri-food markets. This article builds on perspectives from relational economic geography to delve deeply into the micro-social processes that underpin market coordination. We examine how trust functions as a central coordinating mechanism in smallholder-based agri-food value chains in Thailand. Drawing on qualitative interviews with actors from the different segments of the value chains for onions and Chinese cabbage, two major crops in Thailand, the study explores how interpersonal relations, inherited networks and socio-cultural norms underpin economic transactions. Instead of viewing trust as a relational supplement to governance structures, the article argues that trust constitutes a primary mode of coordination in hybrid and informal market systems. While trust-based relations enable continuity and stability in volatile agricultural markets, they also reinforce dependency and power asymmetries, particularly for upstream actors. Trust can facilitate upgrading by reducing uncertainty and enabling access to resources, yet the results show that reinforced dependencies and power asymmetries inhibit innovation and investment into business development through lock-in effects. This results in limited opportunities for upgrading and economic development, particularly among smallholders and the smaller traders. The findings challenge conventional typologies of global value chains by highlighting the micro-social foundations of coordination and the double-edged nature of trust in shaping upgrading opportunities. We argue that there is a need to understand these micro-social processes of market coordination and value chain governance in order to address uneven patterns of economic development, particularly among smallholders and traders in agri-food value chains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoforum
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2026.104600
Primary Topic
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trust-building processes in agri-food value chains: Perspectives from Thailand

Sinne Borby Ørtenblad, Marianne Nylandsted Larsen
Geoforum
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
article

Trust-building processes in agri-food value chains: Perspectives from Thailand

Sinne Borby Ørtenblad, Marianne Nylandsted Larsen
article en

Abstract

• Trust is key in coordination of Thai smallholder-based retailer-driven value chains. • Actors invest in trust building and maintenance not assets for business development. • Trust-based ties stabilize trade but reinforce power asymmetries. • The combination of trust and power asymmetry leads to lock-in, limiting upgrading. • Relational governance calls for new strategies in informal agri-food markets. This article builds on perspectives from relational economic geography to delve deeply into the micro-social processes that underpin market coordination. We examine how trust functions as a central coordinating mechanism in smallholder-based agri-food value chains in Thailand. Drawing on qualitative interviews with actors from the different segments of the value chains for onions and Chinese cabbage, two major crops in Thailand, the study explores how interpersonal relations, inherited networks and socio-cultural norms underpin economic transactions. Instead of viewing trust as a relational supplement to governance structures, the article argues that trust constitutes a primary mode of coordination in hybrid and informal market systems. While trust-based relations enable continuity and stability in volatile agricultural markets, they also reinforce dependency and power asymmetries, particularly for upstream actors. Trust can facilitate upgrading by reducing uncertainty and enabling access to resources, yet the results show that reinforced dependencies and power asymmetries inhibit innovation and investment into business development through lock-in effects. This results in limited opportunities for upgrading and economic development, particularly among smallholders and the smaller traders. The findings challenge conventional typologies of global value chains by highlighting the micro-social foundations of coordination and the double-edged nature of trust in shaping upgrading opportunities. We argue that there is a need to understand these micro-social processes of market coordination and value chain governance in order to address uneven patterns of economic development, particularly among smallholders and traders in agri-food value chains.

GeoforumVol. 171
Geocenter Denmark (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.