From Evidence to Action: A Qualitative Study Exploring Stakeholder Views on Sharing Exercise Oncology Findings

A substantial body of evidence supports the role of exercise in mitigating many effects of cancer and its treatments. However, services for survivors remain scarce, highlighting a significant research-to-practice gap. To address this gap, it is essential to explore strategies that could enhance the dissemination of evidence, supporting the translation of exercise oncology trial findings into clinical practice. To this end, this qualitative study aimed to explore the viewpoints of stakeholders (patients/healthcare professionals (HCPs)/policy makers/researchers) on the dissemination of exercise oncology trials. Stakeholders were invited to take part in a one-to-one semi-structured interview exploring their experiences of and preferences for exercise oncology trial dissemination. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using a thematic approach. Thirty stakeholders were recruited: patients with a history of cancer (n = 14), healthcare professionals (HCPs) (n = 3), researchers (n = 10), and policy makers/healthcare management (n = 3). Median interview length was 14 min and 10 s (range 8 min 16 s to 37 min and 23 s). Three main themes were identified: (i) the need for enhanced dissemination strategies, (ii) engaging stakeholders throughout the study lifespan as key to facilitating effective dissemination, and (iii) tools to support closing the research-to-practice gap. Results indicate that stakeholders want dissemination approaches tailored to the intended audience and presented in formats that are accessible both linguistically and practically, recognising the individuality of each stakeholder group. To support this, three main recommendations were generated: (i) engage all stakeholders throughout the entire research project, from planning to dissemination, to ensure that dissemination avenues are appropriately targeted; (ii) implement a multi-component dissemination strategy that incorporates multiple avenues, blending traditional and innovative approaches to address the priorities of specific stakeholder groups; (iii) adopt multiple communication approaches that extend beyond written format alone and use stakeholder-specific language which is understandable to target audience while maintaining credibility and rigour.