Maternal information sampling targets children's knowledge gaps

According to recent computational approaches, when children are presented with information by knowledgeable others, children can make the pedagogical inference that their partner has chosen the best possible data in order for them to learn from. But do caregivers - the child's first teachers - really choose the best possible data for their child to learn? The current study examined the extent to which caregivers (and their 4- to 5.5-year-old children) sample information to fill gaps in children's knowledge of object-label associations. Furthermore, we examined the repercussions of such pedagogical sampling in terms of children's retention of labels for objects they elicited as opposed to labels elicited by their mothers. The results suggest that mothers are worthy of the pedagogical assumption in that they not only choose information tailored to fill their child's knowledge gaps, but that children also appear to learn better when information is specifically elicited by their caregivers. In contrast, children did not sample information that fills gaps in their knowledge of the object-label associations presented. Our findings speak to the pedagogical role of caregivers in interactions with their children and the power of social learning in early childhood.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2026-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106496
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maternal information sampling targets children's knowledge gaps

Sebastian Isbaner, Shreya Venkatesan, Nivedita Mani, Ricarda Bothe
Acta Psychologica
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Maternal information sampling targets children's knowledge gaps

Sebastian Isbaner, Shreya Venkatesan, Nivedita Mani, Ricarda Bothe
article en

Abstract

According to recent computational approaches, when children are presented with information by knowledgeable others, children can make the pedagogical inference that their partner has chosen the best possible data in order for them to learn from. But do caregivers - the child's first teachers - really choose the best possible data for their child to learn? The current study examined the extent to which caregivers (and their 4- to 5.5-year-old children) sample information to fill gaps in children's knowledge of object-label associations. Furthermore, we examined the repercussions of such pedagogical sampling in terms of children's retention of labels for objects they elicited as opposed to labels elicited by their mothers. The results suggest that mothers are worthy of the pedagogical assumption in that they not only choose information tailored to fill their child's knowledge gaps, but that children also appear to learn better when information is specifically elicited by their caregivers. In contrast, children did not sample information that fills gaps in their knowledge of the object-label associations presented. Our findings speak to the pedagogical role of caregivers in interactions with their children and the power of social learning in early childhood.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 264
University of Göttingen (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.