Effect of Layer Thickness and Scanning Parameters on Melt Pool Geometry and Track Continuity in Powder-Bed Arc Additive Manufacturing

Powder-bed arc additive manufacturing (PBAAM) may reduce the cost of powder-bed metal additive manufacturing and enable thicker layers than laser powder bed fusion (LPBF), but melt-track stability limits are not well established. Here, 316L stainless steel powder (15–53 µm) was melted by a TIG-based arc in a custom powder-bed system while varying current, travel speed, layer thickness and hatch distance. Single tracks on an inclined bed (≈0–0.4 mm thickness) were used to identify continuity loss and melt-pool width, quantified from top-view images via width profiles, a gap-based continuity metric and the coefficient of variation. Parallel-track tests at 0.15, 0.20 and 0.25 mm layer thickness with hatch distances set to 25%, 50% and 75% of the measured melt-pool width assessed inter-track bonding and lack of fusion, and selected parameters were validated in five-layer builds. Higher current with low-to-moderate travel speeds produced wider, more stable melt pools on the inclined bed. Hatch ratios of 25–50% were the most effective for sustaining fusion in single layers and multi-layer builds, whereas 75% promoted unbonded regions and narrow-track morphologies. Overall, PBAAM can process substantially thicker layers with relatively simple equipment, but requires a narrow, carefully tuned window to balance continuity, fusion and heat accumulation.