Study on Ensuring Evacuation Time, Considering the Scale-Specific Multi-Error Characteristics of Tunnel Fire Simulation

Owing to the limitations of actual fire experiments, research on large-scale fires, such as those in tunnels, has primarily relied on numerical simulations. Scaled models are used to ensure computational efficiency and reproducibility. However, scaling can introduce physical distortions, necessitating a careful review of the reliability of analysis results. In this study, tunnel fire simulations were performed using PyroSim, and smoke spread and error characteristics were analyzed according to varying scales, starting from a scale of 1:1. Our analysis targeted a bus fire scenario that occurred 200 m from a 1,000 m tunnel. Scales of 1:1, 1:2, 1:5, 1:10, and 1:20 were analyzed. Based on smoke arrival times, error rates were compared across various scales using regression estimation (RE), maximum accuracy (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE). Walking-speed conditions were applied to examine the impact of varying scales on evacuation time. The results revealed differences in smoke flow and error rates depending on scale, with large-scale models tending to provide more conservative estimates of evacuation time.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Fire Science and Engineering
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7731/kifse.d14e24ac
Primary Topic
Fire dynamics and safety research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study on Ensuring Evacuation Time, Considering the Scale-Specific Multi-Error Characteristics of Tunnel Fire Simulation

Keesin Jeong, Ha-Jun Im, Tae-Gyu Lee
Fire Science and Engineering
Fire dynamics and safety research
article

Study on Ensuring Evacuation Time, Considering the Scale-Specific Multi-Error Characteristics of Tunnel Fire Simulation

Keesin Jeong, Ha-Jun Im, Tae-Gyu Lee
article en

Abstract

Owing to the limitations of actual fire experiments, research on large-scale fires, such as those in tunnels, has primarily relied on numerical simulations. Scaled models are used to ensure computational efficiency and reproducibility. However, scaling can introduce physical distortions, necessitating a careful review of the reliability of analysis results. In this study, tunnel fire simulations were performed using PyroSim, and smoke spread and error characteristics were analyzed according to varying scales, starting from a scale of 1:1. Our analysis targeted a bus fire scenario that occurred 200 m from a 1,000 m tunnel. Scales of 1:1, 1:2, 1:5, 1:10, and 1:20 were analyzed. Based on smoke arrival times, error rates were compared across various scales using regression estimation (RE), maximum accuracy (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE). Walking-speed conditions were applied to examine the impact of varying scales on evacuation time. The results revealed differences in smoke flow and error rates depending on scale, with large-scale models tending to provide more conservative estimates of evacuation time.

Fire Science and EngineeringVol. 40(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Fire dynamics and safety research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.