Blending Student Engagement and Voice with Staff Training in Restorative Practices: Findings from the Feasibility Test of the SpeakOut with Advocatr Program

We describe outcomes from a small-scale feasibility study of the SpeakOut with Advocatr program intended to empower middle school students to make their voices heard, while simultaneously training school personnel in restorative approaches to promoting classrooms and schools where students feel comfortable speaking up. The study was conducted in a small rural middle school. We collected pre and post survey data from school staff and students, as well as interview data from the school administrator, counselor, and teachers who implemented the student curriculum. Results indicated some statistically non-significant changes in the desired direction on the staff survey, and few changes on the student survey. Student engagement appeared to decline from pre to post. Qualitative data provided strong support for the feasibility and continued use of the SpeakOut with Advocatr program. We provide recommendations for elevating student voice in the context of current literature and our study results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Improving Schools
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13654802261419882
Primary Topic
Education Discipline and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blending Student Engagement and Voice with Staff Training in Restorative Practices: Findings from the Feasibility Test of the SpeakOut with Advocatr Program

Erik J. Girvan, John Inglish, Claudia G. Vincent, Rita Svanks et al.
Improving Schools
Education Discipline and Inequality
article

Blending Student Engagement and Voice with Staff Training in Restorative Practices: Findings from the Feasibility Test of the SpeakOut with Advocatr Program

Erik J. Girvan, John Inglish, Claudia G. Vincent, Rita Svanks, Darren Reiley, Jeff Gau, Heather McClure
article en

Abstract

We describe outcomes from a small-scale feasibility study of the SpeakOut with Advocatr program intended to empower middle school students to make their voices heard, while simultaneously training school personnel in restorative approaches to promoting classrooms and schools where students feel comfortable speaking up. The study was conducted in a small rural middle school. We collected pre and post survey data from school staff and students, as well as interview data from the school administrator, counselor, and teachers who implemented the student curriculum. Results indicated some statistically non-significant changes in the desired direction on the staff survey, and few changes on the student survey. Student engagement appeared to decline from pre to post. Qualitative data provided strong support for the feasibility and continued use of the SpeakOut with Advocatr program. We provide recommendations for elevating student voice in the context of current literature and our study results.

Improving Schools
University of Oregon (US), The Dialogue (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Education Discipline and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.