Rheumatoide Arthritis: Langzeitkontrolle der DMARD-Therapie besser individualisiert als routinemäßig?

Background: Scarcity of data on the value of long-term routine laboratory toxicity monitoring (lt-RLTM) during disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) use results in frequent monitoring in clinical practice. Objective: To determine the cumulative incidence of abnormal and very abnormal laboratory monitoring results among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to characterize the clinical context for the incidence of new very abnormal results. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: The Netherlands, July 2008 to April 2020. Patients: Patients with RA undergoing lt-RLTM after at least 6 months of DMARD use. Measure: ments: Cumulative probabilities of abnormal and very abnormal results were calculated for alanine aminotransferase (>100 and >300 U/L), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; <60 and <45 mL/min/1.73 m2), hemoglobin (Hb; <7.5 mmol/L [females] or <8 mmol/L [males] and <6 mmol/L), leukocyte count (<3.5 and <2.0 × 109/L), and platelet count (<140 and <100 × 109/L). Chart review for newly occurring very abnormal results was performed for clinical context. Results: 4774 patients underwent 59 555 lt-RLTM test sets over 18 383 patient-years. The cumulative probabilities of very abnormal laboratory results for the 5 tests varied from 0.2% (leukocyte count) to 6.6% (eGFR) at 2 years and from 0.3% (leukocyte count) to 11% (eGFR) at 5 years. New very abnormal results (n = 449) mostly occurred after a dose increase (6.5%), were often already known or suspected (47.7%), were considered to be unrelated to DMARD use (24.1%), or did not lead to action (35.8%). The incidence of less serious abnormal results was higher, as high as 39% for eGFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 61% for Hb level below 7.5 mmol/L for females or below 8 mmol/L for males. Limitation: The possibility that regular monitoring contributed to lack of serious adverse outcomes cannot be excluded. Conclusion: Routine laboratory monitoring after 6 months of DMARD use revealed that most very abnormal laboratory results were already clinically anticipated and often occurred after dose escalation, although the cumulative incidence of some less serious abnormal results was quite high. Strategies for lt-RLTM warrant reconsideration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kompass Autoimmun
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000550567
Primary Topic
Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rheumatoide Arthritis: Langzeitkontrolle der DMARD-Therapie besser individualisiert als routinemäßig?

Carina Mihai
Kompass Autoimmun
Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
article

Rheumatoide Arthritis: Langzeitkontrolle der DMARD-Therapie besser individualisiert als routinemäßig?

Carina Mihai
article en

Abstract

Background: Scarcity of data on the value of long-term routine laboratory toxicity monitoring (lt-RLTM) during disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) use results in frequent monitoring in clinical practice. Objective: To determine the cumulative incidence of abnormal and very abnormal laboratory monitoring results among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to characterize the clinical context for the incidence of new very abnormal results. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: The Netherlands, July 2008 to April 2020. Patients: Patients with RA undergoing lt-RLTM after at least 6 months of DMARD use. Measure: ments: Cumulative probabilities of abnormal and very abnormal results were calculated for alanine aminotransferase (>100 and >300 U/L), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; <60 and <45 mL/min/1.73 m2), hemoglobin (Hb; <7.5 mmol/L [females] or <8 mmol/L [males] and <6 mmol/L), leukocyte count (<3.5 and <2.0 × 109/L), and platelet count (<140 and <100 × 109/L). Chart review for newly occurring very abnormal results was performed for clinical context. Results: 4774 patients underwent 59 555 lt-RLTM test sets over 18 383 patient-years. The cumulative probabilities of very abnormal laboratory results for the 5 tests varied from 0.2% (leukocyte count) to 6.6% (eGFR) at 2 years and from 0.3% (leukocyte count) to 11% (eGFR) at 5 years. New very abnormal results (n = 449) mostly occurred after a dose increase (6.5%), were often already known or suspected (47.7%), were considered to be unrelated to DMARD use (24.1%), or did not lead to action (35.8%). The incidence of less serious abnormal results was higher, as high as 39% for eGFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 61% for Hb level below 7.5 mmol/L for females or below 8 mmol/L for males. Limitation: The possibility that regular monitoring contributed to lack of serious adverse outcomes cannot be excluded. Conclusion: Routine laboratory monitoring after 6 months of DMARD use revealed that most very abnormal laboratory results were already clinically anticipated and often occurred after dose escalation, although the cumulative incidence of some less serious abnormal results was quite high. Strategies for lt-RLTM warrant reconsideration.

Kompass AutoimmunVol. 8(1)
University of Zurich (CH), University Hospital of Zurich (CH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.