Impacts of Line-of-Sight Kinematic and Dynamic Empirical Parameters on GRACE-FO Orbit Determination and Gravity Field Recovery

The dynamic approach integrates Global Positioning System and K-band range-rate (KRR) observations to enable precise orbit determination (POD) and gravity field recovery. However, background model uncertainties and temporal aliasing introduce frequency-dependent noise into the post-fit KRR residuals, thereby degrading overall solution accuracy. To mitigate these effects, empirical signals are typically modeled using either dynamic (DYN) or kinematic (KIN) parameterization strategies. Nevertheless, the combined use of DYN and KIN parameterizations remains largely unassessed, and their potential synergistic impact on POD and gravity field recovery merits systematic evaluation. This study evaluates the individual and joint impacts of DYN and KIN (DYN+KIN) on The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) Follow-On orbit accuracy and monthly gravity field recovery using nearly one year of 2019 data (excluding February due to severe data gaps). The refined solutions act as empirical temporal filters, effectively suppressing low-frequency components in KRR residuals, particularly below 1-cycle-per-revolution. Relative to nominal ambiguity-fixed reduced-dynamic orbits, the refined solutions mainly enhance the cross-track component, with DYN+KIN showing the largest improvement, while along-track precision experiences only minor (sub-millimeter) degradation. Overall three-dimensional orbit accuracy improves from 3.8 cm to 3.0 cm (DYN), 2.8 cm (KIN), and 2.8 cm (DYN+KIN). In terms of gravity field recovery, the DYN+KIN solution begins to exhibit more pronounced deviations from the other solutions beyond degree and order 30. Over oceanic regions, residual mass anomaly analysis shows that the DYN+KIN solution is associated with an approximately 16% higher noise level compared to the individual DYN and KIN strategies, which exhibit modest noise reductions relative to the nominal solution. The DYN+KIN also exhibits a dampened ~160-day periodicity in the temporal evolution of low-degree coefficients (e.g., C2,0), likely due to spectral overlap between empirical parameter frequencies and low-degree gravity signal components. These results indicate that over-parameterization introduces spectral redundancy and absorbs geophysical signals, underscoring the need to balance parameter flexibility and signal fidelity in gravity recovery strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18050695
Primary Topic
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impacts of Line-of-Sight Kinematic and Dynamic Empirical Parameters on GRACE-FO Orbit Determination and Gravity Field Recovery

Geng Gao, Yongqi Zhao, Shoujian Zhang, Haifeng Liu et al.
Remote Sensing
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
article

Impacts of Line-of-Sight Kinematic and Dynamic Empirical Parameters on GRACE-FO Orbit Determination and Gravity Field Recovery

Geng Gao, Yongqi Zhao, Shoujian Zhang, Haifeng Liu, Luping Zhong
article en

Abstract

The dynamic approach integrates Global Positioning System and K-band range-rate (KRR) observations to enable precise orbit determination (POD) and gravity field recovery. However, background model uncertainties and temporal aliasing introduce frequency-dependent noise into the post-fit KRR residuals, thereby degrading overall solution accuracy. To mitigate these effects, empirical signals are typically modeled using either dynamic (DYN) or kinematic (KIN) parameterization strategies. Nevertheless, the combined use of DYN and KIN parameterizations remains largely unassessed, and their potential synergistic impact on POD and gravity field recovery merits systematic evaluation. This study evaluates the individual and joint impacts of DYN and KIN (DYN+KIN) on The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) Follow-On orbit accuracy and monthly gravity field recovery using nearly one year of 2019 data (excluding February due to severe data gaps). The refined solutions act as empirical temporal filters, effectively suppressing low-frequency components in KRR residuals, particularly below 1-cycle-per-revolution. Relative to nominal ambiguity-fixed reduced-dynamic orbits, the refined solutions mainly enhance the cross-track component, with DYN+KIN showing the largest improvement, while along-track precision experiences only minor (sub-millimeter) degradation. Overall three-dimensional orbit accuracy improves from 3.8 cm to 3.0 cm (DYN), 2.8 cm (KIN), and 2.8 cm (DYN+KIN). In terms of gravity field recovery, the DYN+KIN solution begins to exhibit more pronounced deviations from the other solutions beyond degree and order 30. Over oceanic regions, residual mass anomaly analysis shows that the DYN+KIN solution is associated with an approximately 16% higher noise level compared to the individual DYN and KIN strategies, which exhibit modest noise reductions relative to the nominal solution. The DYN+KIN also exhibits a dampened ~160-day periodicity in the temporal evolution of low-degree coefficients (e.g., C2,0), likely due to spectral overlap between empirical parameter frequencies and low-degree gravity signal components. These results indicate that over-parameterization introduces spectral redundancy and absorbs geophysical signals, underscoring the need to balance parameter flexibility and signal fidelity in gravity recovery strategies.

Remote SensingVol. 18(5)
Harbin Institute of Technology (CN), Wuhan University (CN), East China University of Technology (CN), China Earthquake Administration (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Wuhan University, Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.