RASA-ORIENTED NARRATIVES IN ŚRĪMAD BHĀGAVATAM AND GOPĀLA-CAMPŪ (A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ŚRĪLA VYĀSADEVA AND ŚRĪ JĪVA GOSVĀMĪ)

Śrīmad Bhāgavatam and Gopāla-campū represent two distinct yet complementary modes of narrating Kṛṣṇa-līlā within the Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇava tradition. While both texts recount the same divine events, especially those related to vātsalya, sakhya, and mādhurya rasas, their narrative strategies differ fundamentally. Śrīla Vyāsadeva, writing the Bhāgavatam, adopts a restrained, philosophically regulated approach to rasa, ensuring that emotional intensity never eclipses metaphysical clarity or scriptural authority. Śrī Jīva Gosvāmī, composing Gopāla-campū, assumes the acceptance of Bhāgavatam theology and expands the same events through poetic elaboration and psychological depth, thereby enabling contemplative relishing (rasa-āsvāda). This paper undertakes an event-wise comparative analysis of key rasa-oriented līlās, demonstrating that the difference between the two texts lies not in doctrine but in pedagogical and aesthetic intention. Together, they form a unified elucidative model in which tattva is first established through śāstra and subsequently internalized through rasa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18780979
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RASA-ORIENTED NARRATIVES IN ŚRĪMAD BHĀGAVATAM AND GOPĀLA-CAMPŪ (A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ŚRĪLA VYĀSADEVA AND ŚRĪ JĪVA GOSVĀMĪ)

Dr. Akshya Kumar Mishra
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Indian and Buddhist Studies
article

RASA-ORIENTED NARRATIVES IN ŚRĪMAD BHĀGAVATAM AND GOPĀLA-CAMPŪ (A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ŚRĪLA VYĀSADEVA AND ŚRĪ JĪVA GOSVĀMĪ)

Dr. Akshya Kumar Mishra
article en

Abstract

Śrīmad Bhāgavatam and Gopāla-campū represent two distinct yet complementary modes of narrating Kṛṣṇa-līlā within the Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇava tradition. While both texts recount the same divine events, especially those related to vātsalya, sakhya, and mādhurya rasas, their narrative strategies differ fundamentally. Śrīla Vyāsadeva, writing the Bhāgavatam, adopts a restrained, philosophically regulated approach to rasa, ensuring that emotional intensity never eclipses metaphysical clarity or scriptural authority. Śrī Jīva Gosvāmī, composing Gopāla-campū, assumes the acceptance of Bhāgavatam theology and expands the same events through poetic elaboration and psychological depth, thereby enabling contemplative relishing (rasa-āsvāda). This paper undertakes an event-wise comparative analysis of key rasa-oriented līlās, demonstrating that the difference between the two texts lies not in doctrine but in pedagogical and aesthetic intention. Together, they form a unified elucidative model in which tattva is first established through śāstra and subsequently internalized through rasa.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
The Sanskrit College and University (IN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Indian and Buddhist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.